From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id A3D04E00C6E; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:10:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [74.125.82.50 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282C8E00C39 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:10:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id 62so621016wmw.1 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:10:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ossystems-com-br.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UY7ineJpacOyhwJTSyvOAAbHHs+T0eJ9fq8rp2fiBog=; b=ienI7eoDmiQab7g/EDN/O18HtkUWa7YziWuS+wT0SowWf8M7NYZ81IThv0wxlqJiM+ dpfpVW48bQWlxr7ROfGQThybKpW/fZwciz3qHd/Aat9aVorct0yxyle1WYWYpBvDdZLW +KzpAnh1IND8WjNS30qxOygZfMDykqIG2IVycKsO05pEcRHxdH6icXoOBtyHjiuBkSc6 9uV8De/d1lrQ4/6UD5FZ5t1FXVCmNpK3lEqbScEmNw8ha+jOygI89WL8tHfl43MeFOQK Hbj59Kd5G1uXTvgujQ7niWlWbAsObL3cm229H7cP51Hl3cg7pJkfkDcGlo9598twtXLJ Whmg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UY7ineJpacOyhwJTSyvOAAbHHs+T0eJ9fq8rp2fiBog=; b=J/3Egq4oQ+Rdscy7twqHuxRehciB58J1ttV3SURzU2tjSwOmuY9D7HfHeyw7X8npLU 7r2AMc1QdBNYEBq/NdhpO1MBw3krxDPyDuTSizTDncrXgj46DzQEPCBdu+4MVKOfg6zG nk9SyKxVvg68x4AC4C2M026wFITv1rJPH630tgRuzd0hioaPw2GDSLJ3NPd/zAiybc3Y bPanUz/xoKavOFfgk/avFw1tEQsJg/Gu2D+ZgKVGS5i4koHaW4sC/JWpc5t5VkG3Syk/ EhKK9qiyakqIhjxR5vBPY7NEV8KcAhsev+4t/XzKQkuByjnVW4QFL4N1bglUeAChfPvq tyew== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw1108J4J87/SISohJDOblqC1KZDuTt6BMKi+gCQubK2ADbLwgjn2W skhM6Ace7H/+f3hiqRw= X-Received: by 10.28.12.66 with SMTP id 63mr3172713wmm.130.1499879446518; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:10:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com. [74.125.82.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 19sm3443966wrx.26.2017.07.12.10.10.45 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:10:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Otavio Salvador X-Google-Original-From: Otavio Salvador Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id 62so620294wmw.1 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:10:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.28.68.132 with SMTP id r126mr3406876wma.118.1499879444969; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:10:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.73.84 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:10:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20170712121529.20511-1-otavio@ossystems.com.br> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 14:10:43 -0300 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Daiane Angolini Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] u-boot-fslc: Upgrade to 2017.07-based release X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:10:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Daiane Angolini wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Otavio Salvador > wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Fabio Berton >> wrote: >>> Why not rename machine file to imx6sabresd and imx6sabreauto, once these >>> machine are for solo, dual, quad and quad plus, or "qdl" doesn't mean that >>> the machine configuration is only for quad and dual? >> >> That is a good question indeed. >> >> Essentially we are following the kernel here. Basically the Quad and >> DualLite are the two SoC die we support as the Dual and Solo are >> reduced versions of those. The QuadPlus is a Quad with a newer >> revision so in the end of the day it is right ;-) > > I don't have strong arguments on this topic. But I think Fabio's > suggestions is way more beautiful. > > (the argument here is beauty, so weak argument. And in fact I can say > it without stumbling) My biggest concern about using the imx6 without qdl is that for me it says it works for all (q, dl, sx, ul, sl, sll, ...). -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750