From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f196.google.com (mail-wr0-f196.google.com [209.85.128.196]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53AC78237 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 17:33:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr0-f196.google.com with SMTP id z45so39820874wrb.2 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:33:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ossystems-com-br.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=P35nDu0OLH9XAuAdBKjXXAjKIv1xA4RTVZpAsKmJu4g=; b=opgCDLUfWQO3NxQNJ5JogQFkequZVAJC4n2ykSgbp/Z5eU3gVdwY5+4TXMiVa6Dhz8 FXPMUZb6Blq9vDYY6y5TxsXL0Ip3oIM2+9oehkrtDi1Ka2EUiyJ0Sjv08i3hnH9Ah4/m UxdVlB2FlwsGSiRlMNSeDar5kbWHk8LrFpKLe0SLbCw01UB9MQsDBXzFbT86SYQhR634 jLkZyFZoF5QA1feiPOXYOjD9VtrRx8jgfeWowsA7nHTZb9eN9VnbB5F2zkYsrYJhfE1N 0Jee1RTtpKTTLj0MSZJYSnoL9zPO/m1vsEcUEPOI1TVPSQf8eGfWCdKuNtfzdMQBbrUW NoBw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=P35nDu0OLH9XAuAdBKjXXAjKIv1xA4RTVZpAsKmJu4g=; b=jD/5EZAFcDmXDbxi2P6rl4i5O74xnD6rmsrsh6dnI2u4oi0GuL/v8RfMbwFv9/qSsu OEei7C+4jIW/jqRxuTXfL3fOYNGpiYMTPDNxrmwT4Q912cwGJmDMPzWq9Gogs+em+OV5 /YOtBy+ZKIDIXjXwU9xDLZ6FHao4/2ecG/eqN/WrvKDwF8I3XesJyeJ2CVBcfDtwasVD rfpO7kTxvLhEqbTVF0Qb1QcAtFPwM3/RIVSthy3rQIj2DsCRCiBhSPFCevhFv50U3SZE MsS71sVMWAvyJ9fYyWLUjKBa1HtladNWTPiRB6ciWZGFcvaHMD/67I9KhXT3Hj85qsJa itkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOzWKSevLZdh3Wn3Vw7hyD4YMtOFuJGquK1I94mCZp+lL6T9oqIe br3l705EAzL/R52TOu8= X-Received: by 10.223.135.68 with SMTP id 4mr17978153wrz.141.1498843988231; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:33:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com. [74.125.82.45]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n14sm6082119wmd.1.2017.06.30.10.33.06 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:33:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Otavio Salvador X-Google-Original-From: Otavio Salvador Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id w126so116055118wme.0 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:33:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.28.63.66 with SMTP id m63mr1507133wma.118.1498843986675; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:33:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.209.14 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:33:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170630154456.GB28177@linux.intel.com> References: <823180ba-066d-747d-8112-a110633a03a8@ossystems.com.br> <20170628073121.GA11425@linux.intel.com> <20170629083942.GA14649@linux.intel.com> <20170630083717.GA788@linux.intel.com> <1498813333.5259.4.camel@intel.com> <20170630122330.GA17125@linux.intel.com> <1498828593.5259.7.camel@intel.com> <20170630154456.GB28177@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 14:33:05 -0300 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Ed Bartosh Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] #11662 - wic should mount /boot X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 17:33:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Ed Bartosh wrote: > We're talking about different things here, I guess. For me if target > rootfs content in the image is different from rootfs produced by bitbake > it means it's modified. > > BTW, if this patchset is accepted wic will not be changing fstab in original rootfs anymore: > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2017-June/138803.html > However, it would not mean that rootfs is not changed. Honestly it is quite confusing to me that wic changes fstab content. It is confusing as you add something on base-files for fstab and it may, or not, be what is used. As I mentioned before, our needs is to have a way to forbid this behavior and we use standard wks files specially when doing development so an option makes it easy to adopt one way or another in a distro for example. Other possible rootfs changes also should be possible to be disabled but IMO it should be per-feature (one for fstab, one for exclude, ...). -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750