From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 346BAE00777; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:19:01 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.160.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-yk0-f169.google.com (mail-yk0-f169.google.com [209.85.160.169]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5097E007A0 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:18:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yk0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 79so16966878ykr.0 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:18:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fxBGnG028yQPDLwuck3/4cTl5try4XtOjGHRUdaVodY=; b=ZNicPaYP9348Xr8vUrWxsKSRP+MGja7iJkKv0Vf2zSj04QKup2xCeyfBfsEzy4OghC zS5vJNW5HTdZlHQ7zAwIUo2IHNkK8ZRaQxiOMKAEek5E7vtY/ap+ra76J0DSM9jEafDf BMvm9IqTOA547FUbo0b3mwhshtQQ3J0E1n5luuTq0IXYIt+/PARZigLwhtV/T7pP8ND3 qPT33laX5eHtmJUnHCpm5J0OHyGenR4lMh2MwO39xrGpTgecX4cascwtVIId1i/qGaQ2 DryaS0ufjln8L5j5qolGS4sF3zJ8D/3cPKdQhyYKJtzTJbrQkTsB8cpDLY2GUxozKDlG WWdA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.44.98 with SMTP id m62mr19929131yhb.136.1424189934287; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:18:54 -0800 (PST) Sender: otavio.salvador@gmail.com Received: by 10.170.123.133 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:18:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1423646393-7407-1-git-send-email-sky.captin@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:18:54 -0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: pU-HrkiA2JBig8ZgKohMbOGZg6U Message-ID: From: Otavio Salvador To: Werner Grift Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 73/73] Added absolute paths to checks when copying the device tree X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:19:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Werner Grift wrote: > The device tree issue I refer too is the device tree file that is not bei= ng > copied to the boot partition because the generated script > create_image.sdcard contains if statements that assume that the current > working directory is ${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE} which it is not. In my case it w= as > ${OE_BASE} which makes sense since it is where bitbake is called from. How is your platform setup? FSL Community BSP usually looks like: . =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 build =E2=94=82 =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 conf =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 README =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 setup-environment =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 sources =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 base =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 Documentation =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 meta-fsl-arm =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 meta-fsl-arm-extra =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 meta-fsl-demos =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 meta-openembedded =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 poky Is yours same layout? --=20 Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750