From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id AC2A4E00B6D; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 13:10:03 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.192.181 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-pf0-f181.google.com (mail-pf0-f181.google.com [209.85.192.181]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A9EE00B66 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 13:10:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf0-f181.google.com with SMTP id n128so87183381pfn.3 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 13:10:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ossystems-com-br.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=dJb2MwdBWgkmo3OzYnA1Wbkh3KK3PCDE/3oHQXGsGHk=; b=boS4p8X1MKsFHaCFwgyoRtBHX+K1PqrtntkeDKKkG9rEh3tAnsx95XupGDgQCuge7n ko+5ClYLW9c6WT3LWXibzOmhwJqXgtI5IGo6zsDHCFiJwZuUJ7jFmn+S7yeEmIR5GX+l EB3N7DW1W0Gl+5BKb315uNLgWllx0gBnZ9OzQTUEnFtN29BTB/CSY8najd0/C/b0PuJE eAysbd5+OMNZo1o1K/nWUbfrBFirbDZlKhIQlAQMfLD0kna9+gcLoCU1z1m+rTywEyM1 Vn7FKEGC/LAgsBdRYk/uZrpH6Ldxpv+BP8xPJk9sXtT85H/j+Pjrz/E+jOopH4xiX7dz FZjA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=dJb2MwdBWgkmo3OzYnA1Wbkh3KK3PCDE/3oHQXGsGHk=; b=DZEBh1yppQ47xmWvhXHHuMLZ6YPrT9vWW/FQVVyWPYn7mUItVWUurl9cehOdbMRmp8 00qjQE0AQYwLo0TmS76+LVKOap+AnSd+wy1m+p8Fohi/psYYhZsZkvi3fWqXExrIll9m NTKY7G84p2J/01zeldWNhCcqokXwrPmUQykKa3hnYdn5ZkKwgRRsfJ0M3fejRG9tGl/C rHblu9LZLwoKtZLugl3u45J8s9H/H3eZBnzV5y2W+BdhDfLw5yezSVNStrHaiaFuH0O/ nAZBfP29xadXcDMM7R+ICgDnGEfqy+BPnGW9hxsNNmxSvqSEImF1pXCSNk1CK5WdIRyM Ak1A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkRTMR760yf6BNV7rjMCuF/rjXc+tvULoCGlWPyk/4xtkreYtDZgeTBrARVYi0Y4RFAJQ6OtER8dX/Uv7Ha5G1N9R76zQ== X-Received: by 10.98.17.151 with SMTP id 23mr553637pfr.30.1452719401732; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 13:10:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pf0-f181.google.com (mail-pf0-f181.google.com. [209.85.192.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r89sm4620338pfa.57.2016.01.13.13.10.00 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Jan 2016 13:10:00 -0800 (PST) From: Otavio Salvador X-Google-Original-From: Otavio Salvador Received: by mail-pf0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 65so87190729pff.2 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 13:10:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.98.16.72 with SMTP id y69mr459650pfi.95.1452719399953; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 13:09:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.72.229 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 13:09:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5696A8AA.6000807@pseudoterminal.org> References: <1452242605-5213-1-git-send-email-dv@pseudoterminal.org> <5696A8AA.6000807@pseudoterminal.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 19:09:59 -0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Carlos Rafael Giani Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH] gstreamer1.0-plugins-imx: Update to version 0.12.0 X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 21:10:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Carlos Rafael Giani wrote: > This makes no sense. The new version does _not_ look for libfslvpuwrap. > Checking the log.do_configure output of my local build confirms this. > Perhaps for some reason the older 0.11.1 version is being used? I checked the source code and it does not seem to look at it indeed. However it failed on this recipe. Would be possible the code is auto-detecting its availability and enabling something? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750