Re: [meta-freescale-layer][PATCH 00/50] QorIQ patches

From: Otavio Salvador <otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br>
To: Ting Liu <ting.liu@nxp.com>
Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" <meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: [meta-freescale-layer][PATCH 00/50] QorIQ patches
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 10:11:02 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP9ODKrLo5uHBtQPzHfAvLVET6LXvOSMeKw3j+Dg5KK-GmRRdw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB5PR0401MB17827B9209047A29AB11481299180@DB5PR0401MB1782.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Ting Liu <ting.liu@nxp.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2016 10:47 PM
>> To: Ting Liu <ting.liu@nxp.com>
>> Cc: Zhenhua Luo <zhenhua.luo@nxp.com>; meta-
>> freescale@yoctoproject.org
>> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-freescale-layer][PATCH 00/50] QorIQ
>> patches
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Ting Liu <ting.liu@nxp.com> wrote:
>> > Hello Otavio,
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br]
>> >> Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 9:53 PM
>> >> To: Zhenhua Luo <zhenhua.luo@nxp.com>
>> >> Cc: Ting Liu <ting.liu@nxp.com>; meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
>> >> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-freescale-layer][PATCH 00/50]
>> >> QorIQ patches
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Zhenhua Luo <zhenhua.luo@nxp.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Can you please review and merge the remaining patches of QorIQ SDK
>> 2.0?
>> >> Currently the kernel build is blocked for QorIQ targets. Attached is
>> >> the latest CI report.
>> >>
>> >> I merged a number of changes since you made the branch and to be
>> >> honest I assumed they were the same stuff; please rebase the tree and
>> >> let me know when it is ready for review again please.
>> > [Liu Ting-B28495] I did not see new commits on github meta-freescale layer
>> since Jul 22.
>> > The tree I sent on July 23 was already based on the latest.
>>
>> I sent the patches I think are fine to master-next; the device tree path
>> changes seems unclear for me. Why it is need?
>
> [Liu Ting-B28495] a sub-folder fsl/ under arch/powerpc/boot/dts/ was created to hold all the device tree files in kernel source:
> http://git.freescale.com/git/cgit.cgi/ppc/sdk/linux.git/tree/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl?h=sdk-v2.0.x

The path for the dtb is not the usual way of using it; it would be
better if the Makefile was fixed so normal usage works.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750