Em seg., 18 de jul. de 2022 às 18:18, Richard Purdie <
richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> escreveu:

> > It does, indeed, but it doesn't seem related to this PR.
> >
> > Do you know if this has worked?
> >
> > I am asking as I did all development and testing using SDKMACHINE ?=
> > 'x86_64' and even MACHINE ?= 'qemuarm64' worked just fine. However,
> > looking at some of the logs above, it seems it is using an SDKMACHINE
> > as i686, so this appears as a different issue for me.
> >
>
> rust-cross-canadian hasn't officially worked properly or been
> supported. In assessing whether a patch is better or worse, it is
> useful to know which cases regress and which improve. I had hoped this
> list of failures would be smaller. I will admit I don't know whether
> this is better or worse than before so I guess that is the next thing I
> need to determine.
>

I told you. I tried SDKMACHINE as x86_64 on a x86_64 host and this worked.

What we don't know right now is which combinations work and which don't
> so we can't even tell people what is expected to work and what
> isn't/doesn't :(
>

See above.


> I mentioned this report in case someone can work out the pattern, or
> even better, understand what a fix looks like...
>

I am not familiar enough to Rust boostrap to help here but we spent a lot
of time to get the SDK working and I think this is a step on the right
direction, at least.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9 9981-7854          Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750