> It does, indeed, but it doesn't seem related to this PR.
>
> Do you know if this has worked?
>
> I am asking as I did all development and testing using SDKMACHINE ?=
> 'x86_64' and even MACHINE ?= 'qemuarm64' worked just fine. However,
> looking at some of the logs above, it seems it is using an SDKMACHINE
> as i686, so this appears as a different issue for me.
>
rust-cross-canadian hasn't officially worked properly or been
supported. In assessing whether a patch is better or worse, it is
useful to know which cases regress and which improve. I had hoped this
list of failures would be smaller. I will admit I don't know whether
this is better or worse than before so I guess that is the next thing I
need to determine.
I told you. I tried SDKMACHINE as x86_64 on a x86_64 host and this worked.
What we don't know right now is which combinations work and which don't
so we can't even tell people what is expected to work and what
isn't/doesn't :(
See above.
I mentioned this report in case someone can work out the pattern, or
even better, understand what a fix looks like...
I am not familiar enough to Rust boostrap to help here but we spent a lot of time to get the SDK working and I think this is a step on the right direction, at least.