From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3FE4C43334 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 21:41:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk1-f169.google.com (mail-qk1-f169.google.com [209.85.222.169]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.33396.1658180473910007344 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 14:41:14 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@ossystems-com-br.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.s=20210112 header.b=iZBSpL+4; spf=pass (domain: ossystems.com.br, ip: 209.85.222.169, mailfrom: otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br) Received: by mail-qk1-f169.google.com with SMTP id m16so5594945qka.12 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 14:41:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ossystems-com-br.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=from:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NSrzJZxibQPyvsmIAtWeutJfg1/R7tKA+Tk/hB9jj/w=; b=iZBSpL+4ttPPPT/tse7+JlRvUCer+q1+T5hPQT3O4ZxVngN+pS/laIPciCuZObVY4t mk2O04nM79lwjUKdb13IJ9yobiNPFjl9LzfSd8pd+rSz49gD30hVcvzvdHzlKuzVpn3L OTE5X7mVbmg+4ir9YbHhg+RU7sSvwsdlXXCxrYMkasvUjIyKvKI7j9fl8hotkiunqdWw 73vz0dYsBbt5dKhIuuPDShCYO8lv066LFuX8o0B69yJ1OiY3O+xcMVAarzVbLtESuxFu MpyBv/uXmxtVgB8eE0J9tOv1p/JL126k/AZWUG8bBRFWE5sPJnecdeeLzeFqVRJ2KKlZ d8/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NSrzJZxibQPyvsmIAtWeutJfg1/R7tKA+Tk/hB9jj/w=; b=bRPZISyoFFQGVK7my/OXsp0BWp2tTkFfVV+RbzH9Nnzu8drrkoLfruMRzA7spHsyxF D5P9BgIQkvNiHXSFtRGlEK2Bf5XEsiAdR9G9wSrxdj2DWsh3KHRdyWWt9n1hLflIVd7k XYrzxZDABhuSrNieXsrw5RSQOQEhucFrv8wP21RzwBlMxfmz4eKEGOT51SCuztj3e5I1 36l7KLilwXVbzkmrvscZuISffzv3+b0cdhXuP44AEl3VI4yOL/Kd55e/FMJ3Z+0nzHGd /AFDvFgxi5CdVZA9RxrxwAuUNSlTnb7hKV/UdNNwohKzxWdFu7enzr1AQJOiO0pWe/Yd z/7w== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+rbaALiF0KpP1KGoBJjzujRU0SHOFg1Gy9vaM9muzHXPW9asLW AZzed+QMIcqdHcdA/eNZ2OmpmK5GzVPdGJ3s X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tyWWYQnZF8PIU+KUsf+6FEgGOLWCjb49D6ARRx7qSOccPytih4gxCDQv/N7wiDQoF4R43AjA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:25c8:b0:6ae:2408:6e9a with SMTP id y8-20020a05620a25c800b006ae24086e9amr18863741qko.222.1658180472714; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 14:41:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qk1-f169.google.com (mail-qk1-f169.google.com. [209.85.222.169]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bk30-20020a05620a1a1e00b006b5e23587c2sm6049737qkb.85.2022.07.18.14.41.12 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Jul 2022 14:41:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Otavio Salvador X-Google-Original-From: Otavio Salvador Received: by mail-qk1-f169.google.com with SMTP id o26so9846822qkl.6 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 14:41:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:29d6:b0:6b5:be51:fcf0 with SMTP id s22-20020a05620a29d600b006b5be51fcf0mr17197576qkp.705.1658180471839; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 14:41:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220710164300.953098-1-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <20220710164300.953098-2-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <8e065ede6abdb6065c862bd8b25cdccf2b6828a8.camel@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 18:41:00 -0300 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 2/2] cargo-cross-canadian: Use SDK's flags during target linking To: Richard Purdie Cc: Khem Raj , Otavio Salvador , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ff626805e41b39cf" List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from li982-79.members.linode.com [45.33.32.79] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 21:41:14 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/168259 --000000000000ff626805e41b39cf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Em seg., 18 de jul. de 2022 =C3=A0s 18:18, Richard Purdie < richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> escreveu: > > It does, indeed, but it doesn't seem related to this PR. > > > > Do you know if this has worked? > > > > I am asking as I did all development and testing using SDKMACHINE ?=3D > > 'x86_64' and even MACHINE ?=3D 'qemuarm64' worked just fine. However, > > looking at some of the logs above, it seems it is using an SDKMACHINE > > as i686, so this appears as a different issue for me. > > > > rust-cross-canadian hasn't officially worked properly or been > supported. In assessing whether a patch is better or worse, it is > useful to know which cases regress and which improve. I had hoped this > list of failures would be smaller. I will admit I don't know whether > this is better or worse than before so I guess that is the next thing I > need to determine. > I told you. I tried SDKMACHINE as x86_64 on a x86_64 host and this worked. What we don't know right now is which combinations work and which don't > so we can't even tell people what is expected to work and what > isn't/doesn't :( > See above. > I mentioned this report in case someone can work out the pattern, or > even better, understand what a fix looks like... > I am not familiar enough to Rust boostrap to help here but we spent a lot of time to get the SDK working and I think this is a step on the right direction, at least. --=20 Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 --000000000000ff626805e41b39cf Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
Em seg., 18 de jul. de 2022 =C3=A0s 1= 8:18, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> escreveu:
> It does, indeed, but it doesn= 't seem related to this PR.=C2=A0
>
> Do you know if this has worked?
>
> I am asking as I did all development and testing using=C2=A0SDKMACHINE= ?=3D
> 'x86_64' and even=C2=A0MACHINE ?=3D 'qemuarm64' worked= just fine. However,
> looking at some of the logs above, it seems it is using an SDKMACHINE<= br> > as i686, so this appears as a different issue for me.
>

rust-cross-canadian hasn't officially worked properly or been
supported. In assessing whether a patch is better or worse, it is
useful to know which cases regress and which improve. I had hoped this
list of failures would be smaller. I will admit I don't know whether this is better or worse than before so I guess that is the next thing I
need to determine.

I told you. I tried = SDKMACHINE as x86_64 on a x86_64 host and this worked.

=
What we don't know ri= ght now is which combinations work and which don't
so we can't even tell people what is expected to work and what
isn't/doesn't :(

See above.
=C2=A0
I mentioned this report in case someone can work out the pattern, or
even better, understand what a fix looks like...

<= /div>
I am not familiar enough to Rust boostrap=C2=A0to help here but w= e spent a lot of time to get the SDK working and I think this is a step on = the right direction, at least.
=C2=A0
--
Otavio Salvador =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 O= .S. Systems
ht= tp://www.ossystems.com.br =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0http://code.ossystems.com.brMobile: +55 (53) 9 9981-7854 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Mobile: +1= (347) 903-9750
--000000000000ff626805e41b39cf--