From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id A2E69E00C96; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:09:34 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.192.181 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-pf0-f181.google.com (mail-pf0-f181.google.com [209.85.192.181]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF05E00ACF for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:09:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf0-f181.google.com with SMTP id u7so63400382pfb.1 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:09:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ossystems-com-br.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=f3QftRY76nXp7smoSWnA9fB8Ez97ge7ni9j5nghUpFQ=; b=JBYfdOEX30p+3B8YgMj3P/Yw5CwAN65znZDf+A0g8/WM0ZAGZXsK2c30BEwqwmqhLf XsiQS74wTqsVj7g/V4RweB7wvYBd0SRcA31+fN1LKqKFg5ZCyKv7WBTZYMeDNt8asE4G blofAb4OqkYpIg/Ly2w1w4zLuEKyAoOUZhbg3toODxD57irFWdXfFNKltAhTUQR6Y2X4 TrurIkH6SwPvFaYqyEpLuotATriFaDZE9638vpeQwpaA6rXFxtqj/4LSf4tNPVMYC0Ay /MGHYcn68Sy/9ETPFpI41ssvHK9MAHwz20Rbgzc2pnVbY/j50gYSXWHI+Yq4LV4PX6t5 UUkw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=f3QftRY76nXp7smoSWnA9fB8Ez97ge7ni9j5nghUpFQ=; b=JN7DG79rgsjsRElMVkZQKxxtBLtFMpeQ3mE8WviNnbUNAYONUP11dS96nlVPAARO+I k5gdTNY9Nt2+5gETyq9w+BUm0AIG3rkOmXWb4Rh23Q+r/tQTxbzzD6n0EiWfwddwmMij cHRIpJBbCMuUJBBLxkh7o/DhqFG7LqDtkwiwds3a9oabmuU1dJCgv16j++RvlBW1fp1n KZhPPXzcZGrMwle0IdBfdOT6AxmuaHtHAVcD756Jm2Ibc7AxAOtd0QTS2nucbaCIOGQp jL/jzigpvp6haLh3WrEJB5nOe60lJmTd3HkxcZrBTHzrrZDjAhhU9MoI47+tWcP8Qtp0 StSA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmBZ0F2dbHT6Dyn+gB0Cqo/YNtIm0ip6ko/J3W/Oa82iPYhM62xOH1ptZ0PjL6kSDM6aydwnrtV1wqAf9kEDVOloXntRw== X-Received: by 10.98.18.206 with SMTP id 75mr27918142pfs.91.1450807772580; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:09:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com (mail-pa0-f54.google.com. [209.85.220.54]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id xr8sm47412106pab.26.2015.12.22.10.09.31 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:09:31 -0800 (PST) From: Otavio Salvador X-Google-Original-From: Otavio Salvador Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id uo6so15672079pac.1 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:09:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.122.72 with SMTP id lq8mr37490623pab.1.1450807770905; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:09:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.72.229 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:09:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <002101d13c9c$7fcb2700$7f617500$@gasera.fi> References: <002101d13c9c$7fcb2700$7f617500$@gasera.fi> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 16:09:30 -0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Andreas Enbacka Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Patch Kontron SMARC sAMX6i to use 3.10.53 kernel instead of 3.10.17 X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 18:09:34 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Andreas Enbacka wrote: > I have currently a working image for the Kontron SMARC sAMX6i evaluation > carrier, based on Yocto Daisy and kernel 3.10.17 (due to the Kontron > supplied patch is done for the Daisy branch of the fsl-community-bsp). In > order to use newer GPU drivers as well as newer Qt version, I would be > interested in moving to the Fido branch, and use slightly newer 3.10.53 > kernel. What would be the best approach to apply the custom Kontron patch to > Fido? The best, is to get Kontron commitment to do the conversion. Ideally they should go to the 3.14.52 GA so it has all last fixes and updates. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750