From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-f177.google.com (mail-ob0-f177.google.com [209.85.214.177]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4B3E013A7 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:31:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id eh20so6128281obb.8 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:31:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=dBUGHLB/a0lvRZ6LjgUX29saNwKjBfgc5dD3oDYTGJw=; b=ui/pnCteRq+qewwGNm1Eqddj6xP0EbhWTDQ97M0+yXU3JON7sLbDUtHBJjIZJFANgT TUDFmYgPCoPceW88+w18+89HbX71UWiDI5ZsCISS95hiXBPb24coqRQfysOh2LuEdVNA VNj9vC2zRI3tvGmyKljxGxkpyuqVVFObJbL1JPk+EBRh5BJYrc+pXNfm5z+MFHTHxFXC sOONO5XrZCrZ/P3hihQjId80psAjo3ICtZ9YeLkznWUS8EIJEte4FPhpod1saYedkhJj zlvOBckdqGV0NhZ3KzbfI2hIJBWfvKciQ4WiogSCL4sHXxpZ0eN5Tm69OW0PFT5xdQ6P tvNw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.25.65 with SMTP id a1mr12030968oeg.40.1364232669495; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:31:09 -0700 (PDT) Sender: otavio.salvador@gmail.com Received: by 10.182.80.198 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:31:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51506E74.4070805@gmail.com> References: <1364215919-13865-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <51506E74.4070805@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:31:09 -0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: AC3ZsQxIGlestJX5ZNnPwJWG9pk Message-ID: From: Otavio Salvador To: John Weber Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm-extra][PATCH] broadcom-nvram-config: Add compatible machine setting X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:31:10 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:34 PM, John Weber wrote: > Otavio - > > I thought the point of setting: > > BROADCOM_FIRMWARE = "INVALID" > > was to throw an error on purpose in case someone added the package to their > machine and did not modify the recipe to provide a corresponding nvram file > for their machine? It will do in rootfs generation as linux-firmware-INVALID won't be instalable. > Doesn't adding COMPATIBLE_MACHINE remove that error? Yes but the reason I added it is because bitbake try to checksum a nvram.txt file which does not exist to other machines and then do a warning during recipe parsing. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: otavio@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br