From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f43.google.com (mail-oi0-f43.google.com [209.85.218.43]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B510560670 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 19:43:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f43.google.com with SMTP id e124so93994882oig.2 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:43:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ossystems-com-br.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Bc/nRZHOyLzQzOSdh71IhCHN56l5bDGMJSdIsKh2w0A=; b=t/aO5s2/B8bz5i4P40l+vR5lxzdGc9iwvupVa/nDR+O4z2ZA4IP29K9KQHKL6udOUK cH0XPqe4e86JdEzHN/AFqj+PUD0QBC5Nhd3VlWEk2MYmMvyV48CgalM3Vb8w3QOeHE0j lzhoVWi08ilp62zsmR6hjFA0XmlU8SBPvEd4mRRVnuIWuQZTpVVNjPXgdXIcKaHunjnA tPBb+B+Zy+mpdEAUHKCo4JI00vmjkhi+ADqtSAGtkMEGCxbgEXfPKlQpMybbn68kfyzB /veOQ53BGTN4bjeQ9A7tiqFoxusPSNAyVnRxWkGURbQZ4n2yXqNRcAVj2Za6Ag2B6pBf nJ6g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Bc/nRZHOyLzQzOSdh71IhCHN56l5bDGMJSdIsKh2w0A=; b=liK+N7mYi2YopKJWQwyJaWU5dVze32gYs6nzYeSzMVU36Y4r8TF7oEreejATj0N+qG J91rJbyzzf1TPpUXHkAl0wmjyukn8nXWq3vIA03UIMjj2GdwJSv8OR9mfLwSNLiHkLZq 3cbZ30axOQWYWVXX2d7vNsFHENOcrp6mKxM+LG2hCowvdDuZ8C1Z4hKbw/EsPvAtc6SM 9BfZOaY/DSeXLdgadOnnj+otAuSXOzQctCFf6K6LYONwZssUVjXjd1Sg8cLm9lK4tr3J DGz7D4rCci8nwwN4vd9jKblyfPes76tIBw2JqQG0ckjsvXAXh6YidCBh89TvNa/Kr8mL hheA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5ggNpSBsiZjK2b0Z8tQEYeGRQD+gZn3P/EkAAOEYfj5u5zSEYDo LMjUCRR8/TLHYSD5894= X-Received: by 10.202.79.6 with SMTP id d6mr30226148oib.6.1502739834504; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:43:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-oi0-f44.google.com (mail-oi0-f44.google.com. [209.85.218.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m62sm9433429oib.19.2017.08.14.12.43.53 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:43:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Otavio Salvador X-Google-Original-From: Otavio Salvador Received: by mail-oi0-f44.google.com with SMTP id x3so93842776oia.1 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:43:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.202.68.2 with SMTP id r2mr27448221oia.225.1502739832881; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:43:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.247.10 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:43:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 16:43:52 -0300 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_M=C3=BCller?= , Raphael Kubo da Costa Cc: "openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org" , Otavio Salvador Subject: Re: chromium detected as stripped X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 19:43:53 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello everyone, On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Andreas M=C3=BCller wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Andreas M=C3=BCller > wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Jussi Kukkonen >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> I chatted with rakuco who's done nice work with up to date chromium in >>> meta-crosswalk, he's got some relevant commits related to this: >>> >>> https://github.com/rakuco/meta-crosswalk/commit/5aae1539c3d62b295dba40f= 494397c0797140b0f >>> https://github.com/rakuco/meta-crosswalk/commit/c56aa2bf047d3a01e14f4f9= bfe5f88664b333f36 >>> >>> On a related note, this good work is currently a bit hidden in >>> meta-crosswalk -- is there a chance we could get this combined with >>> meta-browser (or whatever place makes sense)? I know next to nothing ab= out >>> chromium packaging so CCing Raphael and the meta-browser maintainers fo= r >>> comments. >>> >> That is interesting. If your suspicion is correct, we are very close >> to the edge of file working properly or not. With meta-browser >> c79cf6c7811afd2cd167e8967e3c29b1e797371e (16 commits behind master) I >> get a proper detected and then split chromium. With meta-browser >> master head file incorrectly reports that chrome is split already. I >> did not check the exact size numbers but my file browser reports 4.3G >> for both cases. >> >> Just to gather further information I think about bisecting meta-browser. >> > After first bisect build I checked size:: 4299018288 bytes / 2^32 is > 4294967296 - so no need for further bisecting. Thanks Jussi for the > hint. > > For now I'll choose old version - have not much time to take care. Indeed it does sound like the proper workaround for now. That said, I'd love to receive more help from meta-crosswalk people and avoid duplication of work in packaging Chromium so I am adding Raphael on Cc here so he can comment about how we can try to work together on this. --=20 Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750