On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 12:05 PM Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Oleksandr, > Hi Julien > > On 07/12/2018 09:45, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote: > > From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko > > > > To be able to use it for the hot-plugged CPUs as well. > > You need to explain in the commit message why you rename .init.proc.info. > ok > > > > > Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko > > > > --- > > Changes in v2: > > - Fix typoes > > - Rename ".init.proc.info" to ".data.proc.info" > > --- > > xen/arch/arm/arm32/proc-v7.S | 6 +++--- > > xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S | 10 ++++++---- > > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/arm32/proc-v7.S b/xen/arch/arm/arm32/proc-v7.S > > index 80a250d..a0c0c9e 100644 > > --- a/xen/arch/arm/arm32/proc-v7.S > > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/arm32/proc-v7.S > > @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ brahma15mp_init: > > mcr CP32(r0, ACTLR) > > mov pc, lr > > > > - .section ".init.proc.info", #alloc, #execinstr > > + .section ".data.proc.info", #alloc, #execinstr > > NIT: .proc.info would be sufficient. This would avoid to rename again the > section if we decide to move it in a separate section. > ok > > > .type __v7_ca15mp_proc_info, #object > > __v7_ca15mp_proc_info: > > .long 0x410FC0F0 /* Cortex-A15 */ > > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ __v7_ca15mp_proc_info: > > .long caxx_processor > > .size __v7_ca15mp_proc_info, . - __v7_ca15mp_proc_info > > > > - .section ".init.proc.info", #alloc, #execinstr > > + .section ".data.proc.info", #alloc, #execinstr > > .type __v7_ca7mp_proc_info, #object > > __v7_ca7mp_proc_info: > > .long 0x410FC070 /* Cortex-A7 */ > > @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ __v7_ca7mp_proc_info: > > .long caxx_processor > > .size __v7_ca7mp_proc_info, . - __v7_ca7mp_proc_info > > > > - .section ".init.proc.info", #alloc, #execinstr > > + .section ".data.proc.info", #alloc, #execinstr > > .type __v7_brahma15mp_proc_info, #object > > __v7_brahma15mp_proc_info: > > .long 0x420F00F0 /* Broadcom Brahma-B15 */ > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S b/xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S > > index 245a0e0..624da9b 100644 > > --- a/xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S > > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S > > @@ -88,6 +88,12 @@ SECTIONS > > . = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE); > > *(.data.page_aligned) > > *(.data) > > + > > + . = ALIGN(POINTER_ALIGN); > > + __proc_info_start = .; > > + *(.data.proc.info) > > + __proc_info_end = .; > > Sorry I haven't noticed it in the previous version. proc.info should > never > modified, right? So it should be in rodata in that case. > agree, will link it in rodata. May I resend just this patch after address your comments? > > > + > > . = ALIGN(8); > > __start_schedulers_array = .; > > *(.data.schedulers) > > @@ -151,10 +157,6 @@ SECTIONS > > *(.init.setup) > > __setup_end = .; > > > > - __proc_info_start = .; > > - *(.init.proc.info) > > - __proc_info_end = .; > > - > > __initcall_start = .; > > *(.initcallpresmp.init) > > __presmp_initcall_end = .; > > > > Cheers, > > -- > Julien Grall > -- Regards, Oleksandr Tyshchenko