From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751690AbaGMEJA (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jul 2014 00:09:00 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f176.google.com ([74.125.82.176]:38226 "EHLO mail-we0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750711AbaGMEIw (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jul 2014 00:08:52 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20140711171844.39fcbb50@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 00:08:48 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 11 From: Nick Krause To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Nick Krause wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20140710: >> >> My fixes tree contains: >> powerpc: Disable RELOCATABLE for COMPILE_TEST with PPC64 >> >> The tty.current tree gained a build failure so I used the version from >> next-20140710. >> >> The irqchip tree gained a conflict against the arm64 tree. >> >> The staging tree lost its build failure and gained a conflict against >> the tty tree. >> >> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 5114 >> 4474 files changed, 191199 insertions(+), 226003 deletions(-) >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> I have created today's linux-next tree at >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git >> (patches at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/next/ ). If you >> are tracking the linux-next tree using git, you should not use "git pull" >> to do so as that will try to merge the new linux-next release with the >> old one. You should use "git fetch" and checkout or reset to the new >> master. >> >> You can see which trees have been included by looking in the Next/Trees >> file in the source. There are also quilt-import.log and merge.log files >> in the Next directory. Between each merge, the tree was built with >> a ppc64_defconfig for powerpc and an allmodconfig for x86_64 and a >> multi_v7_defconfig for arm. After the final fixups (if any), it is also >> built with powerpc allnoconfig (32 and 64 bit), ppc44x_defconfig and >> allyesconfig (this fails its final link) and i386, sparc, sparc64 and arm >> defconfig. >> >> Below is a summary of the state of the merge. >> >> I am currently merging 222 trees (counting Linus' and 30 trees of patches >> pending for Linus' tree). >> >> Stats about the size of the tree over time can be seen at >> http://neuling.org/linux-next-size.html . >> >> Status of my local build tests will be at >> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next . If maintainers want to give >> advice about cross compilers/configs that work, we are always open to add >> more builds. >> >> Thanks to Randy Dunlap for doing many randconfig builds. And to Paul >> Gortmaker for triage and bug fixes. >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au >> > I am been trying your tests for a while. Seems most of your failing > tests work for me. > Can you test a newer compiler in the 4.8 release series for gcc to see > if this fixes your > issues. > Cheers Nick I am also attaching logs of build I have that are succeeding to help you.Furthermore I run the builds in two steps listed below using compilers for Ubuntu 14.04 and Fedora 20 turned into dpkgs to work with Debian distros.Below are the steps. 1. make ARCH=x y_defconfig 2.ARCH= x CROSS_COMPILE=z make -j 8 2> error_file x = cpu architecture I am building y=configuration I am building z= gcc I am builds this architecture error_file = file I am tracing errors and warnings to send if build fails to maintainers of that architecture If you have any other questions please ask me. Cheers Nick