From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7D2C47083 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 10:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A22C6135D for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 10:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229754AbhFBKCf (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2021 06:02:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34108 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230019AbhFBKCf (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2021 06:02:35 -0400 Received: from mail-ua1-x92a.google.com (mail-ua1-x92a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E278C061756 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 03:00:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ua1-x92a.google.com with SMTP id j2so963901uak.7 for ; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 03:00:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kYQ8JYBEy7lvKWQDIggyE7Q8g8ZfvSMvIgvFNwg3PWA=; b=E7Y13F9E1P6m6uPrdeFtPtTyYgp71GUHcDG9b9SG8pVTvWIHYbMnx/rfh4IhUwekXb kgTN/r9RzgHk0eTXxUfuovQCmUIyHmpwSR5akNx2dGwSuRMgIkLlQ9PRoG2X7j7Tr/87 U/oT823NKr5UYBcq/D8JtV4dVXpXHAPfb1FWslbbRW5msN9zrWv8K7ELqb6ILqKpN2s4 ViMW9C02GJ53Ojoc4SlzfIMuldlbTQ7gqqUmeEnyScTop1AJMBRpdAoY5QBn0OqjyQp5 9sKPPbvXSrlKMxZvV/V/13nUFxAVVYBxNvLW3+gTus1I4ECirhL2p2o/2tM2DLSKhkMR Rbew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kYQ8JYBEy7lvKWQDIggyE7Q8g8ZfvSMvIgvFNwg3PWA=; b=bJbuoqTXnJmsYJNJmf56QPrwD9gXi7oqzBgkVCb0JCd8EIc4xJUJGiMpvEFAAvggkE 8U6Q0W2PLAV5+J/a+aVj9Hci4R9zfovXuauvJ+NZFqemA0NVzSVcDAkSJse6sVbhAbHD 6aGEygUlGuiEoZ6dIqRQWwC/NJN88Cwi1fBG8Nnr1j5m2/TcOkQrB9vtpVupb9XUBZSn oamRiJPUVU5jzj154VtTUq8hAJmPD8J/SPOYkXAXIIdueVHEHc55A5R81Ux3gvseflLD nG1lJSMw4KFRCl3x1H4K7Jyv9Bbtd8Mn2HsytGkyWgOzLdo/scXQ/BcZ8mXnn0kwyG65 zjEQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532LoSI0f/V/ykfiST0M+OjkPjgqgZTy1+7TVOdEOmgVL6/zNemr IEGY9QyD5riyfelCZamtF7uPubnAS2faddRjwmt7JQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz+fWUP1yrioI1DOXyLCqHIl9Xjim3WV7PVlH8e8dZ1YoqCIkdxvp3qv5nY5bNL/sVkprcAt/yj67IgR33BiIA= X-Received: by 2002:a9f:35b3:: with SMTP id t48mr20019416uad.129.1622628051636; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 03:00:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210601231003.9845-1-digetx@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Ulf Hansson Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 12:00:15 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] NVIDIA Tegra core power domain follow up To: Thierry Reding Cc: Dmitry Osipenko , Jonathan Hunter , linux-tegra , Linux PM , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 11:08, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 02:10:01AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > > Remove the lockdep_set_class(), which Ulf Hansson asked for. And > > prevent core domain syncing if domain node is missing in device-tree, > > which I accidentally missed to add after squashing the standalone > > domain driver into the PMC driver. > > > > Dmitry Osipenko (2): > > soc/tegra: pmc: Don't sync core domain if it's missing in device-tree > > soc/tegra: pmc: Remove usage of lockdep_set_class() > > > > drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 21 +++++++++++---------- > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > I've squashed these into the corresponding patches of you v6 series and > added Ulf's reviewed-by to them. > > Ulf, let me know if I misinterpreted the discussion and your reviewed-by > didn't extend to the original patches. Nope, looks good to me! Thanks! Kind regards Uffe