From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f178.google.com ([209.85.223.178]:45831 "EHLO mail-io0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751318AbdJELMD (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Oct 2017 07:12:03 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f178.google.com with SMTP id i38so705942iod.2 for ; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 04:12:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2081590.uFvUN0fvNT@amdc3058> References: <1506083824-4024-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> <2384661.GfpEZ6rEzz@amdc3058> <2081590.uFvUN0fvNT@amdc3058> From: Ulf Hansson Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 13:12:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 13/15] mmc: block: Add CQE and blk-mq support To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Linus Walleij , Adrian Hunter , linux-mmc , linux-block , linux-kernel , Bough Chen , Alex Lemberg , Mateusz Nowak , Yuliy Izrailov , Jaehoon Chung , Dong Aisheng , Das Asutosh , Zhangfei Gao , Sahitya Tummala , Harjani Ritesh , Venu Byravarasu , Shawn Lin , Christoph Hellwig Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On 5 October 2017 at 12:55, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Wednesday, October 04, 2017 11:48:27 AM Ulf Hansson wrote: >> [...] >> >> >> MQ code that doesn't perform and therefore we cannot switch seamlessly >> >> to MQ. >> > >> > I think that switching seamlessly to blk-mq in short/medium-term >> > is not possible (SCSI tried and failed to do so). The changes to >> > the old path are very complex and besides affecting performance >> > they also affect error recovery handling (which needs to be tested >> > properly before the switch). >> >> Agreed, and that's why I have queued up the new Kconfig option for >> enabling the blkmq path from MMC. > > This seems premature - the new Kconfig option change for "mmc-mq" should > belong to the patch adding "mmc-mq" support (otherwise it may just confuse > users who enable it). I agree! However my plan was to move forward with the CMDQ series, but I realize that I may need to drop the Kconfig patch, in case CMDQ don't make it for 4.15. Kind regards Uffe