From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f169.google.com ([209.85.223.169]:42254 "EHLO mail-io0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751487AbdLAI5O (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2017 03:57:14 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-f169.google.com with SMTP id u42so10485257ioi.9 for ; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 00:57:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171201082048.faekfpx4jrqs3kft@verge.net.au> References: <1511971606-580-1-git-send-email-ulrich.hecht+renesas@gmail.com> <20171201082048.faekfpx4jrqs3kft@verge.net.au> From: Ulf Hansson Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 09:57:13 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] R-Car D3 (r8a77995) SDHI (eMMC) integration To: Simon Horman Cc: Ulrich Hecht , Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux-Renesas , Wolfram Sang , Magnus Damm , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , Marek Vasut Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 1 December 2017 at 09:20, Simon Horman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 05:06:44PM +0100, Ulrich Hecht wrote: >> Hi! >> >> This integrates the SDHI hardware on R-Car D3 and enables the Draak board's >> eMMC drive. >> >> This revision dumps the two patches that have been applied already, fixes >> the sdhi2_pins voltage, removes the redundant SDHI compatible string and >> makes the internal DMAC whitelisting pattern more conservative. >> >> CU >> Uli >> >> >> Ulrich Hecht (2): >> mmc: renesas_sdhi: enable R-Car D3 (r8a77995) support >> arm64: dts: r8a77995: draak: enable SDHI2 > > Hi Ulrich, > > what is the effect of applying patch 2/2 without patch 1/2? > I see that 1/2 has been accepted but ideally I'd like to apply > 2/2 to a branch without 1/2 present. If there is a problem with that, I can take it with your ack. Just tell me. Kind regards Uffe