From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulf Hansson Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/26] kernel/cpu_pm: Manage runtime PM in the idle path for CPUs Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 13:42:06 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20180620172226.15012-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <2056372.NMt4aPaF4h@aspire.rjw.lan> <2205807.cU2puvubpP@aspire.rjw.lan> <1726374.375PCQfjLZ@aspire.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1726374.375PCQfjLZ@aspire.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Sudeep Holla , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Mark Rutland , Linux PM , Kevin Hilman , Lina Iyer , Lina Iyer , Rob Herring , Daniel Lezcano , Thomas Gleixner , Vincent Guittot , Stephen Boyd , Juri Lelli , Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux ARM , linux-arm-msm , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org [...] >> >> Assuming that I have got that right, there are concerns, mostly regarding >> patch [07/26], but I will reply to that directly. > > Well, I haven't got that right, so never mind. > > There are a few minor things to address, but apart from that the general > genpd patches look ready. Alright, thanks! I will re-spin the series and post a new version once 4.19 rc1 is out. Hopefully we can queue it up early in next cycle to get it tested in next for a while. > >> The $subject patch is fine by me by itself, but it obviously depends on the >> previous ones. Patches [01-02/26] are fine too, but they don't seem to be >> particularly useful without the rest of the series. >> >> As far as patches [10-26/26] go, I'd like to see some review comments and/or >> tags from the people with vested interest in there, in particular from Daniel >> on patch [12/26] and from Sudeep on the PSCI ones. > > But this still holds. Actually, patch 10 and patch11 is ready to go as well. I ping Daniel on patch 12. In regards to the rest of the series, some of the PSCI/ARM changes have been reviewed by Mark Rutland, however several changes have not been acked. On the other hand, one can also interpret the long silence in regards to PSCI/ARM changes as they are good to go. :-) Kind regards Uffe From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ulf.hansson@linaro.org (Ulf Hansson) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 13:42:06 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v8 09/26] kernel/cpu_pm: Manage runtime PM in the idle path for CPUs In-Reply-To: <1726374.375PCQfjLZ@aspire.rjw.lan> References: <20180620172226.15012-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <2056372.NMt4aPaF4h@aspire.rjw.lan> <2205807.cU2puvubpP@aspire.rjw.lan> <1726374.375PCQfjLZ@aspire.rjw.lan> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org [...] >> >> Assuming that I have got that right, there are concerns, mostly regarding >> patch [07/26], but I will reply to that directly. > > Well, I haven't got that right, so never mind. > > There are a few minor things to address, but apart from that the general > genpd patches look ready. Alright, thanks! I will re-spin the series and post a new version once 4.19 rc1 is out. Hopefully we can queue it up early in next cycle to get it tested in next for a while. > >> The $subject patch is fine by me by itself, but it obviously depends on the >> previous ones. Patches [01-02/26] are fine too, but they don't seem to be >> particularly useful without the rest of the series. >> >> As far as patches [10-26/26] go, I'd like to see some review comments and/or >> tags from the people with vested interest in there, in particular from Daniel >> on patch [12/26] and from Sudeep on the PSCI ones. > > But this still holds. Actually, patch 10 and patch11 is ready to go as well. I ping Daniel on patch 12. In regards to the rest of the series, some of the PSCI/ARM changes have been reviewed by Mark Rutland, however several changes have not been acked. On the other hand, one can also interpret the long silence in regards to PSCI/ARM changes as they are good to go. :-) Kind regards Uffe