From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593C1C433F5 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 15:51:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F7B60FDC for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 15:51:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1349671AbhICPv7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Sep 2021 11:51:59 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:30005 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235573AbhICPv6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Sep 2021 11:51:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1630684256; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MoQLQTqUY5yDM/Q0pchQHfi3iihhP0hcaHsviw39pb8=; b=bIzPqff02uJU3F917ZBPWIXiba4iwjlsCmg++d8QAWeg62buxo3KqJC7QZmM2fH5m4/iXH nUlID5rNBL4V/3NATYn2MIAAaNK7LUOjKsLredufjDzjnMC4QFCVFgak9sMkFA6Y8BB8w2 BX+PhEPf0HJCLWwLgPccmVPkuOLrP50= Received: from mail-io1-f72.google.com (mail-io1-f72.google.com [209.85.166.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-123-8B9NXTBxMXK_tKUbattV3w-1; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 11:50:55 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 8B9NXTBxMXK_tKUbattV3w-1 Received: by mail-io1-f72.google.com with SMTP id s22-20020a5e98160000b02905afde383110so4158341ioj.8 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 08:50:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MoQLQTqUY5yDM/Q0pchQHfi3iihhP0hcaHsviw39pb8=; b=WDQqtcH2/ydAvAAmrsrQNCFd/fuTN6hjhtPPs5iCqDJHulbv/Hq/71f4i/YvEgXK1P YWXDHSe/Pcr5hg+Za+S8sUL5Y2cgy8Z5xkEwMegWBISMnuR2k7zedZksjkHWSYI8t65W Mt4SXJrZCJ7AusoBFdCe7dGGcUm71RSO1jpY66CObMjmlyE1lvHXsly8PpkizUvxw9z4 80xBfuAt9Wqyp+/t4nLGvVeK0yGWc+JWG18T+wHQLnFqDGuasJ5xraYaX04oRYrQwPyF BLLWdHED1lk+IoZCPYHO3Oo2GsT+3KoPXFQoE6TGz++LEh/K4/9jWnmPZQP3g3J/lalB As+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530uVPyhlVtPcrf6ilaKAcizqN6+BrnGtF1bSrdd7JXgUJIUxn7O Ybat1Mazbj609DaOpdJPB/L9K5JaAdEtVPB882oXmroC7Qb065g3aWY9K6Ji3HF+49oP5+lIA3W ipSsfEfCIQGmeblHv8+gpvKXnwFjNJU7Y8Q== X-Received: by 2002:a92:1944:: with SMTP id e4mr3012464ilm.186.1630684254586; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 08:50:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxA5hXocfG238Br3Kxfn76guZ5oIlMhSVgOX7QM7jB7Qbl9LikvJuc4o8e5u68QJjhURVNmZgDTJj9VHCBUSvY= X-Received: by 2002:a92:1944:: with SMTP id e4mr3012456ilm.186.1630684254354; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 08:50:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210902152228.665959-1-vgoyal@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: Bruce Fields Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 11:50:43 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/1] xfstests: generic/062: Do not run on newer kernels To: Vivek Goyal Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher , fstests , linux-fsdevel , LKML , virtio-fs@redhat.com, Daniel Walsh , David Gilbert , Christian Brauner , Casey Schaufler , LSM , selinux@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" , Miklos Szeredi , Giuseppe Scrivano , stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, Dave Chinner , Alexander Viro Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 11:43 AM Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 10:42:34AM -0400, Bruce Fields wrote: > > Well, we could also look at supporting trusted.* xattrs over NFS. I > > don't know much about them, but it looks like it wouldn't be a lot of > > work to specify, especially now that we've already got user xattrs? > > We'd just write a new internet draft that refers to the existing > > user.* xattr draft for most of the details. > > Will be nice if we can support trusted.* xattrs on NFS. Maybe I should start a separate thread for that. Who would need to be on it to be sure we get this right? --b. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210902152228.665959-1-vgoyal@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: Bruce Fields Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 11:50:43 -0400 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 3/1] xfstests: generic/062: Do not run on newer kernels List-Id: Development discussions about virtio-fs List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Vivek Goyal Cc: Giuseppe Scrivano , Theodore Ts'o , Andreas Gruenbacher , Miklos Szeredi , selinux@vger.kernel.org, stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, Dave Chinner , LKML , fstests , virtio-fs@redhat.com, Casey Schaufler , LSM , Alexander Viro , linux-fsdevel , Christian Brauner On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 11:43 AM Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 10:42:34AM -0400, Bruce Fields wrote: > > Well, we could also look at supporting trusted.* xattrs over NFS. I > > don't know much about them, but it looks like it wouldn't be a lot of > > work to specify, especially now that we've already got user xattrs? > > We'd just write a new internet draft that refers to the existing > > user.* xattr draft for most of the details. > > Will be nice if we can support trusted.* xattrs on NFS. Maybe I should start a separate thread for that. Who would need to be on it to be sure we get this right? --b.