From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Mantas_Mikul=C4=97nas?= Subject: Overlapping IP networks no longer allowed? Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 19:02:32 +0200 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail-pl0-f44.google.com ([209.85.160.44]:46030 "EHLO mail-pl0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1032907AbeBNRCt (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2018 12:02:49 -0500 Received: by mail-pl0-f44.google.com with SMTP id p5so8847746plo.12 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:02:49 -0800 (PST) Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello, As of nftables 0.8.1, it seems I can no longer write anonymous sets which contain overlapping networks (CIDR masks). For example, I want to write the following ruleset: #!/usr/bin/nft -f define users =3D { 10.0.0.0/8, 193.219.181.192/26 } define admins =3D { 10.123.0.0/24, 31.220.42.129 } define allowed =3D { $users, $admins } table inet filter { chain foobar { ip saddr $allowed accept } } results in an error message: Error: interval overlaps with previous one I noticed a few nftables.git commits related to disabling auto-merge for interval sets... but mine don't have the 'interval' flag, and there doesn't seem to be any way to specify 'auto-merge' for anonymous sets, either. --=20 Mantas Mikul=C4=97nas