From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roger Roglans Subject: Re: Trouble reassembling RAID10 Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:24:54 -0600 Message-ID: References: <58AC95F3.3010601@youngman.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <58AC95F3.3010601@youngman.org.uk> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Wols Lists Cc: Phil Turmel , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Hey Wol, Yes I followed it and it was immensely helpful. I guess I didn't want to make my post too long so that is why I only included the shortened command outputs; in the future I'll just include everything. I believe that the big issue was that the --force command did not work when it seemed like it should have. I will keep on the lookout for that bug again in the future. Just a note on the wiki: "When Things Go Wrogn" should be "When Things Go Wrong" Best, Roger On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Wols Lists wrote: > On 21/02/17 18:38, Roger Roglans wrote: >> Hi Phil, >> >> seems very useful to know in the future. I ended up just assuming >> clean and using "--create". Since I was able to discern the exact >> configurations, I was able to mount it and am currently transferring >> data. I know it was not the ideal solution but I believe that it >> worked out with only minimal corruption. I might have problems with >> another array soon. If so, I will certainly contact this mailing list >> again. > > If I can plug my own work :-) there is now a section on the linux wiki > about troubleshooting an array, and what data to gather for the list. > Look at > > https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Linux_Raid#When_Things_Go_Wrogn > > That should be enough to fix simple problems or, for more serious ones, > you'll have the bulk if not all the information the members of the list > will need, saving the back-and-forth of "can we have this, can we have > that". > > If you find any problems with the information on the wiki, let me know > and I'll endeavour to fix it. > > Cheers, > Wol