From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6DD20AA0 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 15:33:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756867AbcHCPdf (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2016 11:33:35 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f195.google.com ([209.85.161.195]:35944 "EHLO mail-yw0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755671AbcHCPde (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2016 11:33:34 -0400 Received: by mail-yw0-f195.google.com with SMTP id u134so17084416ywg.3 for ; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 08:33:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=CKh4Aa86b+UU7YsBceeBfFGElweBaS4zvUcWXN9FQb4=; b=tNdVUJ+oSDfCmePMP8qukrBgMl6Bj0/NJJEXYiUzyZ4ABa+DDmWkYQT277rPglRVyZ MXuEMjCB2c6iOSTMfAMb/XlUCz+vzSMWFeKCH4U4zzTFKCx5RwvEzQJbpF3IJchJAlWP CCFsV38qEw2YxEd1R00D8bisFC2UAjoYEv/TBKKaVpoxTovW3UsxkkqHsJU4v6WlF9BL KxBhMODP/QKP/mAAByu9agfeRGfbBkqK8NlUrLLrqZVM7pTDG4lcNMtjSLrArwdnNHQR LA8psYdWXA61V9yWKt/QmojBJ1rP3wTQ3J1NdwDm7vvl+9QpfqI5QXHYIfbx0wALuw02 12xw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CKh4Aa86b+UU7YsBceeBfFGElweBaS4zvUcWXN9FQb4=; b=ZTFwFPyPv+QJMGp8ATt2fHzsh+EMPaDhrL/ogwInkOR0H0vDqkBXd13bkpo06k+C/z UPAWsA3k6bU7ThW7/UOpYvs1dODwIAyyRG+x5BXNSazfeiTthc6kRrP3BdTXIcL790J8 iEb7o+Phqe0VJpjk0RarVO12bHx2/hwtI6FZujzENXFz01dZJptKXQiut9geV3TBC20l WNeAxjwktuCzQT+EttXyHZz04efgo9F0N6g7YovsOSzr911h66fGfN3zD2qt6XthpoT1 QcmyV2wEjih5sP3wJQ4FjWeB35Vu8JPk7CtxjsVWDa8DatPxGGt5Fr7hndr1iF6aTK9/ 25Mg== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoous/7RPFzpbD+xh+LaLgNZrUrwDpSbvyvQaPEwCmKaeeX8Hcz2cSVHEYRv+uP5qG3e9SFJCCYmFDIZVV/w== X-Received: by 10.129.106.139 with SMTP id f133mr55449386ywc.163.1470238413088; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 08:33:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.13.250.4 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 08:33:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8ff71aba37be979f05abf88f467ec932aa522bdd.1470051326.git.johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> From: Junio C Hamano Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 08:33:12 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -VKxsVGI9E0MIG3s9jdEn4kyySE Message-ID: Subject: Re: patch submission process, was Re: [PATCH v6 06/16] merge_recursive: abort properly upon errors To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Git Mailing List , Eric Sunshine , Jeff King , Johannes Sixt , Duy Nguyen , =?UTF-8?Q?Jakub_Nar=C4=99bski?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:59 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > I disagree, however, with the suggestion to sift through your `pu` branch > and to somehow replace local branches with the commits found there. To be more in line with the "e-mailed patch" workflow, I think what I should do is to send the version I queued with fixups back to the list as follow-up. Just like reviewers review, the maintainer reviews and queues, the original author should be able to work in the same workflow, i.e. reading and applying an improved version of the patch from her mailbox.