All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
	"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
	Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>,
	Tarun Gupta <targupta@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] vfio/mdev: Allow the mdev_parent_ops to specify the device driver to bind
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:56:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4g=MFtZMVZPn8AtTX6NyweF25nuFNVBu7pg_QSP+EGE+g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210428060300.GA4092@lst.de>

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 11:04 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 05:00:04PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * mdev drivers can refuse to bind during probe(), in this case we want to fail
> > + * the creation of the mdev all the way back to sysfs. This is a weird model
> > + * that doesn't fit in the driver core well, nor does it seem to appear any
> > + * place else in the kernel, so use a simple hack.
> > + */
> > +static int mdev_bind_driver(struct mdev_device *mdev)
> > +{
> > +     struct mdev_driver *drv = mdev->type->parent->ops->device_driver;
> > +     int ret;
> > +
> > +     if (!drv)
> > +             drv = &vfio_mdev_driver;
> > +
> > +     while (1) {
> > +             device_lock(&mdev->dev);
> > +             if (mdev->dev.driver == &drv->driver) {
> > +                     ret = 0;
> > +                     goto out_unlock;
> > +             }
> > +             if (mdev->probe_err) {
> > +                     ret = mdev->probe_err;
> > +                     goto out_unlock;
> > +             }
> > +             device_unlock(&mdev->dev);
> > +             ret = device_attach(&mdev->dev);
> > +             if (ret)
> > +                     return ret;
> > +             mdev->probe_err = -EINVAL;
> > +     }
> > +     return 0;
> > +
> > +out_unlock:
> > +     device_unlock(&mdev->dev);
> > +     return ret;
> > +}
>
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_driver.c
> > @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static int mdev_probe(struct device *dev)
> >               return ret;
> >
> >       if (drv->probe) {
> > -             ret = drv->probe(mdev);
> > +             ret = mdev->probe_err = drv->probe(mdev);
> >               if (ret)
> >                       mdev_detach_iommu(mdev);
> >       }
>
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int mdev_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
> > +{
> > +     struct mdev_device *mdev = to_mdev_device(dev);
> > +     struct mdev_driver *target = mdev->type->parent->ops->device_driver;
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * The ops specify the device driver to connect, fall back to the old
> > +      * shim driver if the driver hasn't been converted.
> > +      */
> > +     if (!target)
> > +             target = &vfio_mdev_driver;
> > +     return drv == &target->driver;
> > +}
>
> I still think this going the wrong way.  Why can't we enhance the core
> driver code with a version of device_bind_driver() that does call into
> ->probe?  That probably seems like a better model for those existing
> direct users of device_bind_driver or device_attach with a pre-set
> ->drv anyway.

Wouldn't that just be "export device_driver_attach()" so that drivers
can implement their own custom bind implementation?

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-28  7:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-26 20:00 [PATCH v2 00/13] Remove vfio_mdev.c, mdev_parent_ops and more Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] vfio/mdev: Remove CONFIG_VFIO_MDEV_DEVICE Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-27 11:05   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-27 11:05     ` [Intel-gfx] " Cornelia Huck
2021-04-27 11:05     ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] vfio/mdev: Allow the mdev_parent_ops to specify the device driver to bind Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-27 12:32   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-27 23:20     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-28  6:03   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-28  7:56     ` Dan Williams [this message]
2021-04-28 12:41       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-28 14:00         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-28 19:58           ` Dan Williams
2021-04-28 23:38             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-29  0:00               ` Dave Jiang
2021-05-26  0:42             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-26  1:42               ` Dan Williams
2021-05-27 11:44               ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 14:53                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-27 15:13                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-29  6:51           ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-04  9:36           ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-04 11:30             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-28  6:44   ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-04-28 14:14     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-28 14:24       ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] vfio/mtty: Convert to use vfio_register_group_dev() Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] vfio/mdpy: " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] vfio/mbochs: " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] vfio/ap_ops: " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-04 14:42   ` Tony Krowiak
2021-05-04 16:55     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] vfio/ccw: " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-27 20:06   ` Eric Farman
2021-04-27 22:10     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-28 12:55       ` Eric Farman
2021-04-28 13:21         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-28 17:09   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-28 17:20     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-29 11:58       ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-29 18:13         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-30 12:31           ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-30 17:19             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-03 10:54               ` s390 common I/O layer locking (was: [PATCH v2 07/13] vfio/ccw: Convert to use vfio_register_group_dev()) Cornelia Huck
2021-05-04 15:10                 ` s390 common I/O layer locking Vineeth Vijayan
2021-07-24 13:24                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-03 14:27                     ` Vineeth Vijayan
2021-08-10 15:00                       ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] vfio/gvt: Convert to use vfio_register_group_dev() Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] vfio/mdev: Remove vfio_mdev.c Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-28  6:07   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-28  6:36     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-04-28 12:53       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-29  6:53         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-29  6:56           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-05-03 17:32             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-04  9:38               ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-04 16:20                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] vfio/mdev: Remove mdev_parent_ops dev_attr_groups Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] vfio/mdev: Remove mdev_parent_ops Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] vfio/mdev: Use the driver core to create the 'remove' file Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] vfio/mdev: Remove mdev drvdata Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-27 21:30 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] Remove vfio_mdev.c, mdev_parent_ops and more Alex Williamson
2021-04-27 21:30   ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2021-04-27 21:30   ` Alex Williamson
2021-04-27 22:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-27 22:20     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-27 22:20     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-27 22:49     ` Alex Williamson
2021-04-27 22:49       ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2021-04-27 22:49       ` Alex Williamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPcyv4g=MFtZMVZPn8AtTX6NyweF25nuFNVBu7pg_QSP+EGE+g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.