All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm: initialize struct page for reserved pages in ZONE_DEVICE
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 00:30:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4iQMUOz0euRB3-rEYJyEzt9-Dt3Y0B=0A0nFAYNk0FTfA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180622065510.GA13556@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:55 PM, Naoya Horiguchi
<n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:12:01PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:08 PM, Naoya Horiguchi
>> <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> wrote:
>> > Reading /proc/kpageflags for pfns allocated by pmem namespace triggers
>> > kernel panic with a message like "BUG: unable to handle kernel paging
>> > request at fffffffffffffffe".
>> >
>> > The first few pages (controlled by altmap passed to memmap_init_zone())
>> > in the ZONE_DEVICE can skip struct page initialization, which causes
>> > the reported issue.
>> >
>> > This patch simply adds some initialization code for them.
>> >
>> > Fixes: 4b94ffdc4163 ("x86, mm: introduce vmem_altmap to augment vmemmap_populate()")
>> > Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
>> > ---
>> >  mm/page_alloc.c | 10 +++++++++-
>> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git v4.17-mmotm-2018-06-07-16-59/mm/page_alloc.c v4.17-mmotm-2018-06-07-16-59_patched/mm/page_alloc.c
>> > index 1772513..0b36afe 100644
>> > --- v4.17-mmotm-2018-06-07-16-59/mm/page_alloc.c
>> > +++ v4.17-mmotm-2018-06-07-16-59_patched/mm/page_alloc.c
>> > @@ -5574,8 +5574,16 @@ void __meminit memmap_init_zone(unsigned long size, int nid, unsigned long zone,
>> >          * Honor reservation requested by the driver for this ZONE_DEVICE
>> >          * memory
>> >          */
>> > -       if (altmap && start_pfn == altmap->base_pfn)
>> > +       if (altmap && start_pfn == altmap->base_pfn) {
>> > +               unsigned long i;
>> > +
>> > +               for (i = 0; i < altmap->reserve; i++) {
>> > +                       page = pfn_to_page(start_pfn + i);
>> > +                       __init_single_page(page, start_pfn + i, zone, nid);
>> > +                       SetPageReserved(page);
>> > +               }
>> >                 start_pfn += altmap->reserve;
>> > +       }
>>
>> No, unfortunately this will clobber metadata that lives in that
>> reserved area, see __nvdimm_setup_pfn().
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> This patch doesn't touch the reserved region itself, but only
> struct pages on the region. I'm still not sure why it's necessary
> to leave these struct pages uninitialized for pmem operation?
>
> My another related concern is about memory_failure_dev_pagemap().
> If a memory error happens on the reserved pfn range, this function
> seems to try to access to the uninitialized struct page and maybe
> trigger oops. So do we need something to prevent this?

Those pages are never mapped to userspace, so there is no opportunity
to consume the media error in that space. I'm still not sure it is
safe to initialize the pfns in the reserved range, I'll take a closer
look tomorrow. Otherwise, why not just delete the entire check and let
the main loop initialize the pages?

      reply	other threads:[~2018-06-22  7:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-22  6:08 [PATCH v1] mm: initialize struct page for reserved pages in ZONE_DEVICE Naoya Horiguchi
2018-06-22  6:12 ` Dan Williams
2018-06-22  6:13   ` Dan Williams
2018-06-22  6:55   ` Naoya Horiguchi
2018-06-22  7:30     ` Dan Williams [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPcyv4iQMUOz0euRB3-rEYJyEzt9-Dt3Y0B=0A0nFAYNk0FTfA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.