From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08B22B1B for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 19:47:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yb0-f172.google.com (mail-yb0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E2B21BB for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 19:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 84so75593982ybe.0 for ; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 12:47:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170705184544.GB22044@kroah.com> References: <576cea07-770a-4864-c3f5-0832ff211e94@leemhuis.info> <20170703123025.7479702e@gandalf.local.home> <20170705084528.67499f8c@gandalf.local.home> <4080ecc7-1aa8-2940-f230-1b79d656cdb4@redhat.com> <20170705092757.63dc2328@gandalf.local.home> <20170705140607.GA30187@kroah.com> <20170705184544.GB22044@kroah.com> From: Dan Williams Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 12:47:25 -0700 Message-ID: To: Greg KH Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: ksummit , Carlos O'Donell , Linux API , Thorsten Leemhuis , Shuah Khan Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] & [TECH TOPIC] Improve regression tracking List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 09:54:29AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: >> >> I wrote some test infrastructure to go after xhci TRB boundary >> conditions [1]. So, yes, some of these are possible to unit test, but >> of course not all. >> >> [1]: http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=140872785411304&w=2 > > I forgot about that, what ever happened to it, any reason it never got > merged? Ran out of time before being consumed by NVDIMM stuff, but I did take some of the lessons learned over into tools/testing/nvdimm/. I haven't done the work to integrate that into kselftest, so far it's only exercised by the tests in the 'ndctl' [1] utility. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Williams Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] & [TECH TOPIC] Improve regression tracking Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 12:47:25 -0700 Message-ID: References: <576cea07-770a-4864-c3f5-0832ff211e94@leemhuis.info> <20170703123025.7479702e@gandalf.local.home> <20170705084528.67499f8c@gandalf.local.home> <4080ecc7-1aa8-2940-f230-1b79d656cdb4@redhat.com> <20170705092757.63dc2328@gandalf.local.home> <20170705140607.GA30187@kroah.com> <20170705184544.GB22044@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170705184544.GB22044-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Greg KH Cc: Steven Rostedt , Carlos O'Donell , Linux API , Thorsten Leemhuis , ksummit , Shuah Khan List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 09:54:29AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: >> >> I wrote some test infrastructure to go after xhci TRB boundary >> conditions [1]. So, yes, some of these are possible to unit test, but >> of course not all. >> >> [1]: http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=140872785411304&w=2 > > I forgot about that, what ever happened to it, any reason it never got > merged? Ran out of time before being consumed by NVDIMM stuff, but I did take some of the lessons learned over into tools/testing/nvdimm/. I haven't done the work to integrate that into kselftest, so far it's only exercised by the tests in the 'ndctl' [1] utility. [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl