From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79334C4727C for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:49:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C90C32087D for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:49:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="b3/eSZrx" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C90C32087D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Received: from ml01.vlan13.01.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA72154C7B96; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:49:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::f42; helo=mail-qv1-xf42.google.com; envelope-from=dan.j.williams@intel.com; receiver= Received: from mail-qv1-xf42.google.com (mail-qv1-xf42.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 906C2154C7B95 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qv1-xf42.google.com with SMTP id f11so1129635qvw.3 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:49:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=r8/IDDg3h30xL2yKxOXfAZ6SYDQxULsHhio1WiSzVoE=; b=b3/eSZrxq9ZmquVDBHUWHZcW8jE3GZMuVJn04cLVnXRpAKQlax71RkHw+TItyAcXOf D1/wbcVY1Tp22JA5trNf+ZAjp240f5Hp/IFo/bGRg5t96yAw73K+jPG6eeK7GgW9RdEC ny3mkwjN6Jbxx0cHBrAXUvhnEjA9uZ2q77xjQDVhYp6ayW0dfk4vY+vvylLCH4n3iIou EBVZoV1Mq2driC9DQmvoOR/tuiJl+S81PanPTc7I0Y30DOZRuJSte5ZddOgYWDDA+3Ku d6XBGCk1g17KTfCR9ZIbDx02vyCkW9AKXbdcDIwXXfv6XZ3jt79qZ0dt4xkzIRLPTPkL OZRQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=r8/IDDg3h30xL2yKxOXfAZ6SYDQxULsHhio1WiSzVoE=; b=Ye7o/FWHVRYZ5cVTWqtzKbhynm+E1XbvJHbsy5lIDVcquj/tq/5dUNh2KtZTuCjL+Z ZCM/BgSBRKWtpJ+D/Rt15+C98IKireM2IQmW42GGmAk/QAxUFEBgGF6rZa/MDfULNvr1 UttrpQTgmfodp+JO0gSEErPaxdcYqLFKwli6zUQt3MCaXbsbiQz5lIinHUURguOBo5JO ewdociop/iBAvwJznMWdENhVJcKA53u9MUZ6GWwerBdA5HxcS6a3kaAmGdRX2ThGHILB kza6PlKU/NymVmNp9lZDBt+F6HLR/iYKIEI+GBUTPFnALAnL0n2uyMRIuvp6pzJMtbG9 iQEg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5304nG5s/Vu5j7Bck0aOaEKKC+vIbq4C6geZTZ4WWVYfKY4FwVyK BghLO1unhV4aqeBouj0uxRZ+p+xKfwA/nHMhDDi2Sg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz35tnMcZ3NgGf2cA0sbRzUPpGd/75eBd+InpyMs61ib5CN5zyPrAngEN4AeGJwKtjR6R96dAebjOvm9ebx2O0= X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4d52:: with SMTP id m18mr2946409qvm.55.1601480993835; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:49:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <160087928642.3520.17063139768910633998.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20200930050455.GA6810@zn.tnic> In-Reply-To: <20200930050455.GA6810@zn.tnic> From: Dan Williams Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:49:42 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/2] Renovate memcpy_mcsafe with copy_mc_to_{user, kernel} To: Borislav Petkov Message-ID-Hash: BDQSHU3N4CXF2DFOLRLWNQ2DJI2LVDJW X-Message-ID-Hash: BDQSHU3N4CXF2DFOLRLWNQ2DJI2LVDJW X-MailFrom: dan.j.williams@intel.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; suspicious-header CC: Ingo Molnar , Tony Luck , Peter Zijlstra , Linus Torvalds , Alexander Viro , stable , X86 ML , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Andy Lutomirski , Paul Mackerras , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Erwin Tsaur , Michael Ellerman , Mikulas Patocka , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , 0day robot , linux-nvdimm , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jan Kara X-Mailman-Version: 3.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 10:05 PM Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:32:07PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > Given that Linus was the primary source of review feedback on these > > patches and a version of them have been soaking in -next with only a > > minor conflict report with vfs.git for the entirety of the v5.9-rc > > cycle (left there inadvertently while I was on leave), any concerns > > with me sending this to Linus directly during the merge window? > > What's wrong with them going through tip? There's been a paucity of response on these after converging on the feedback from Linus. They missed v5.9, and I started casting about for what could be done to make sure they did not also miss v5.10 if the quiet continued. The preference is still "through tip". > But before that pls have a look at this question I have here: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200929102512.GB21110@zn.tnic > > Thx. Thanks, Boris, will do. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63788C4727C for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:49:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1964520759 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:49:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="b3/eSZrx" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730800AbgI3Ptz (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:49:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45486 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725893AbgI3Pty (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:49:54 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-xf42.google.com (mail-qv1-xf42.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f42]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EF7BC0613D0 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:49:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qv1-xf42.google.com with SMTP id di5so1110264qvb.13 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:49:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=r8/IDDg3h30xL2yKxOXfAZ6SYDQxULsHhio1WiSzVoE=; b=b3/eSZrxq9ZmquVDBHUWHZcW8jE3GZMuVJn04cLVnXRpAKQlax71RkHw+TItyAcXOf D1/wbcVY1Tp22JA5trNf+ZAjp240f5Hp/IFo/bGRg5t96yAw73K+jPG6eeK7GgW9RdEC ny3mkwjN6Jbxx0cHBrAXUvhnEjA9uZ2q77xjQDVhYp6ayW0dfk4vY+vvylLCH4n3iIou EBVZoV1Mq2driC9DQmvoOR/tuiJl+S81PanPTc7I0Y30DOZRuJSte5ZddOgYWDDA+3Ku d6XBGCk1g17KTfCR9ZIbDx02vyCkW9AKXbdcDIwXXfv6XZ3jt79qZ0dt4xkzIRLPTPkL OZRQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=r8/IDDg3h30xL2yKxOXfAZ6SYDQxULsHhio1WiSzVoE=; b=BXcWjWajvm3tRRookARxD+wR4AG4EVWN98+89KbOj8guenw2P8zbVXmT7YByZ7SAa8 ITNWPK4OWWxmjBhBdLmT0kl1W/7nHc5liBwWDhorVtIGiYvLit5k8qLk+6hpIYGd9wi2 MyRkA5U0CT0pFtNMPXHFhPfA3H4s4gJOgIQsiBTx+2UnJs+fmkQcu4Prhj6SCyNwwGBb t3VOLBKCvPY++hpRTTn6E3V5phS/fI+FX3uRFM0Ru13GThXdGh7jlyrVHDaYJX/xlNNv /f3ul0OZnE3sATzw1YBPEtYce/I5qlmHhI/oFZJS94wrMSGEIxwDCrtQ8fGSHKvEM5O2 Yq4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5300g8x55PewdeWiA5hqfWI43GQmMh1K9owBWpMyXVe/YW2SBMeA 6mh5p85+fwrWEjhUDfLACaczz9ZF9GpdDXKvZnTmRg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz35tnMcZ3NgGf2cA0sbRzUPpGd/75eBd+InpyMs61ib5CN5zyPrAngEN4AeGJwKtjR6R96dAebjOvm9ebx2O0= X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4d52:: with SMTP id m18mr2946409qvm.55.1601480993835; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:49:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <160087928642.3520.17063139768910633998.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20200930050455.GA6810@zn.tnic> In-Reply-To: <20200930050455.GA6810@zn.tnic> From: Dan Williams Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:49:42 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/2] Renovate memcpy_mcsafe with copy_mc_to_{user, kernel} To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Ingo Molnar , Tony Luck , Peter Zijlstra , Linus Torvalds , Alexander Viro , stable , X86 ML , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Andy Lutomirski , Paul Mackerras , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Erwin Tsaur , Michael Ellerman , Mikulas Patocka , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , 0day robot , linux-nvdimm , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jan Kara Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 10:05 PM Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:32:07PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > Given that Linus was the primary source of review feedback on these > > patches and a version of them have been soaking in -next with only a > > minor conflict report with vfs.git for the entirety of the v5.9-rc > > cycle (left there inadvertently while I was on leave), any concerns > > with me sending this to Linus directly during the merge window? > > What's wrong with them going through tip? There's been a paucity of response on these after converging on the feedback from Linus. They missed v5.9, and I started casting about for what could be done to make sure they did not also miss v5.10 if the quiet continued. The preference is still "through tip". > But before that pls have a look at this question I have here: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200929102512.GB21110@zn.tnic > > Thx. Thanks, Boris, will do.