All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
	Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>,
	Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] scsi, block: fix duplicate bdi name registration crashes
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 14:40:17 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jC5mVednFh8crsa0-GGFyPPEBKHUz5itCQ_4Tc1tX6Ew@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e331cf91-37a2-d886-1136-4f33279e65ad@kernel.dk>

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> On 02/01/2017 02:05 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> Warnings of the following form occur because scsi reuses a devt number
>> while the block layer still has it referenced as the name of the bdi
>> [1]:
>>
>>  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 93 at fs/sysfs/dir.c:31 sysfs_warn_dup+0x62/0x80
>>  sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/virtual/bdi/8:192'
>>  [..]
>>  Call Trace:
>>   dump_stack+0x86/0xc3
>>   __warn+0xcb/0xf0
>>   warn_slowpath_fmt+0x5f/0x80
>>   ? kernfs_path_from_node+0x4f/0x60
>>   sysfs_warn_dup+0x62/0x80
>>   sysfs_create_dir_ns+0x77/0x90
>>   kobject_add_internal+0xb2/0x350
>>   kobject_add+0x75/0xd0
>>   device_add+0x15a/0x650
>>   device_create_groups_vargs+0xe0/0xf0
>>   device_create_vargs+0x1c/0x20
>>   bdi_register+0x90/0x240
>>   ? lockdep_init_map+0x57/0x200
>>   bdi_register_owner+0x36/0x60
>>   device_add_disk+0x1bb/0x4e0
>>   ? __pm_runtime_use_autosuspend+0x5c/0x70
>>   sd_probe_async+0x10d/0x1c0
>>   async_run_entry_fn+0x39/0x170
>>
>> This is a brute-force fix to pass the devt release information from
>> sd_probe() to the locations where we register the bdi,
>> device_add_disk(), and unregister the bdi, blk_cleanup_queue().
>>
>> Thanks to Omar for the quick reproducer script [2]. This patch survives
>> where an unmodified kernel fails in a few seconds.
>
> What is the patch against? Doesn't seem to apply cleanly for me on
> master, nor the 4.11 block tree.
>

I built it on top of Jan's bdi fixes series [1]. I can rebase to
block/for-next, just let me know which patches you want to take first.

[1]: http://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=148586843819160&w=2

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-01 22:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-01 22:05 [PATCH v3] scsi, block: fix duplicate bdi name registration crashes Dan Williams
2017-02-01 22:23 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-01 22:23   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-01 22:23   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-01 22:35 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-01 22:40   ` Dan Williams [this message]
2017-02-01 22:43     ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-02 15:23       ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-02  8:14 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPcyv4jC5mVednFh8crsa0-GGFyPPEBKHUz5itCQ_4Tc1tX6Ew@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    --cc=osandov@osandov.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.