All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
To: Dan Moulding <dan@danm.net>, junxiao.bi@oracle.com
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev,
	 stable@vger.kernel.org, yukuai1@huaweicloud.com
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] 6.7.1: md: raid5 hang and unresponsive system; successfully bisected
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:01:47 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW49L8B9K8QFg68v=zG9ywMehUTD18DaG4PexEt-3mzQqQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240123235803.8298-1-dan@danm.net>

Thanks for the information!


On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 3:58 PM Dan Moulding <dan@danm.net> wrote:
>
> > This appears the md thread hit some infinite loop, so I would like to
> > know what it is doing. We can probably get the information with the
> > perf tool, something like:
> >
> > perf record -a
> > perf report
>
> Here you go!
>
> # Total Lost Samples: 0
> #
> # Samples: 78K of event 'cycles'
> # Event count (approx.): 83127675745
> #
> # Overhead  Command          Shared Object                   Symbol
> # ........  ...............  ..............................  ...................................................
> #
>     49.31%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] handle_stripe
>     18.63%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] ops_run_io
>      6.07%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] handle_active_stripes.isra.0
>      5.50%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] do_release_stripe
>      3.09%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
>      2.48%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] r5l_write_stripe
>      1.89%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] md_wakeup_thread
>      1.45%  ksmd             [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] ksm_scan_thread
>      1.37%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] stripe_is_lowprio
>      0.87%  ksmd             [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] memcmp
>      0.68%  ksmd             [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] xxh64
>      0.56%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] __wake_up_common
>      0.52%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] __wake_up
>      0.46%  ksmd             [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] mtree_load
>      0.44%  ksmd             [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] try_grab_page
>      0.40%  ksmd             [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] follow_p4d_mask.constprop.0
>      0.39%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] r5l_log_disk_error
>      0.37%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] _raw_spin_lock_irq
>      0.33%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] release_stripe_list
>      0.31%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] release_inactive_stripe_list

It appears the thread is indeed doing something. I haven't got luck to
reproduce this on my hosts. Could you please try whether the following
change fixes the issue (without reverting 0de40f76d567)? I will try to
reproduce the issue on my side.

Junxiao,

Please also help look into this.

Thanks,
Song

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-25  0:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-23  0:56 [REGRESSION] 6.7.1: md: raid5 hang and unresponsive system; successfully bisected Dan Moulding
2024-01-23  1:08 ` Song Liu
2024-01-23  1:35 ` Dan Moulding
2024-01-23  6:35   ` Song Liu
2024-01-23 21:53     ` Dan Moulding
2024-01-23 22:21       ` Song Liu
2024-01-23 23:58         ` Dan Moulding
2024-01-25  0:01           ` Song Liu [this message]
2024-01-25 16:44             ` junxiao.bi
2024-01-25 19:40               ` Song Liu
2024-01-25 20:31               ` Dan Moulding
2024-01-26  3:30                 ` Carlos Carvalho
2024-01-26 15:46                   ` Dan Moulding
2024-01-30 16:26                     ` Blazej Kucman
2024-01-30 20:21                       ` Song Liu
2024-01-31  1:26                       ` Song Liu
2024-01-31  2:13                         ` Yu Kuai
2024-01-31  2:41                       ` Yu Kuai
2024-01-31  4:55                         ` Song Liu
2024-01-31 13:36                           ` Blazej Kucman
2024-02-01  1:39                             ` Yu Kuai
2024-01-26 16:21                   ` Roman Mamedov
2024-01-31 17:37                 ` junxiao.bi
2024-02-06  8:07                 ` Song Liu
2024-02-06 20:56                   ` Dan Moulding
2024-02-06 21:34                     ` Song Liu
2024-02-20 23:06 ` Dan Moulding
2024-02-20 23:15   ` junxiao.bi
2024-02-21 14:50     ` Mateusz Kusiak
2024-02-21 19:15       ` junxiao.bi
2024-02-23 17:44     ` Dan Moulding
2024-02-23 19:18       ` junxiao.bi
2024-02-23 20:22         ` Dan Moulding
2024-02-23  8:07   ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-02-24  2:13     ` Song Liu
2024-02-25 17:46       ` Thomas B. Clark
2024-02-26  1:17         ` Thomas B. Clark
2024-02-26 17:35           ` Song Liu
2024-03-01 20:26       ` junxiao.bi
2024-03-01 23:12         ` Dan Moulding
2024-03-02  0:05           ` Song Liu
2024-03-06  8:38             ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-03-06 17:13               ` Song Liu
2024-03-02 16:55         ` Dan Moulding
2024-03-07  3:34         ` Yu Kuai
2024-03-08 23:49         ` junxiao.bi
2024-03-10  5:13           ` Dan Moulding
2024-03-11  1:50           ` Yu Kuai
2024-03-12 22:56             ` junxiao.bi
2024-03-13  1:20               ` Yu Kuai
2024-03-14 18:20                 ` junxiao.bi
2024-03-14 22:36                   ` Song Liu
2024-03-15  1:30                   ` Yu Kuai
2024-03-14 16:12             ` Dan Moulding
2024-03-15  1:17               ` Yu Kuai
2024-03-19 14:16                 ` Dan Moulding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPhsuW49L8B9K8QFg68v=zG9ywMehUTD18DaG4PexEt-3mzQqQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan@danm.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=junxiao.bi@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.