From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Song Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 02/11] bpf: add also cbpf long jump test cases with heavy expansion Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 11:09:44 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20180528004344.3606-1-daniel@iogearbox.net> <20180528004344.3606-3-daniel@iogearbox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Borkmann Return-path: Received: from mail-qk0-f193.google.com ([209.85.220.193]:45008 "EHLO mail-qk0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965678AbeE2SJq (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2018 14:09:46 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-f193.google.com with SMTP id 185-v6so12213429qkk.11 for ; Tue, 29 May 2018 11:09:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20180528004344.3606-3-daniel@iogearbox.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 5:43 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > We have one triggering on eBPF but lets also add a cBPF example to > make sure we keep tracking them. Also add anther cBPF test running > max number of MSH ops. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann > Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Song Liu > --- > lib/test_bpf.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c > index 317f231..60aedc8 100644 > --- a/lib/test_bpf.c > +++ b/lib/test_bpf.c > @@ -356,6 +356,52 @@ static int bpf_fill_maxinsns11(struct bpf_test *self) > return __bpf_fill_ja(self, BPF_MAXINSNS, 68); > } > > +static int bpf_fill_maxinsns12(struct bpf_test *self) > +{ > + unsigned int len = BPF_MAXINSNS; > + struct sock_filter *insn; > + int i = 0; > + > + insn = kmalloc_array(len, sizeof(*insn), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!insn) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + insn[0] = __BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP | BPF_JA, len - 2, 0, 0); > + > + for (i = 1; i < len - 1; i++) > + insn[i] = __BPF_STMT(BPF_LDX | BPF_B | BPF_MSH, 0); > + > + insn[len - 1] = __BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_K, 0xabababab); > + > + self->u.ptr.insns = insn; > + self->u.ptr.len = len; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int bpf_fill_maxinsns13(struct bpf_test *self) > +{ > + unsigned int len = BPF_MAXINSNS; > + struct sock_filter *insn; > + int i = 0; > + > + insn = kmalloc_array(len, sizeof(*insn), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!insn) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + for (i = 0; i < len - 3; i++) > + insn[i] = __BPF_STMT(BPF_LDX | BPF_B | BPF_MSH, 0); > + > + insn[len - 3] = __BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM, 0xabababab); > + insn[len - 2] = __BPF_STMT(BPF_ALU | BPF_XOR | BPF_X, 0); > + insn[len - 1] = __BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0); > + > + self->u.ptr.insns = insn; > + self->u.ptr.len = len; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int bpf_fill_ja(struct bpf_test *self) > { > /* Hits exactly 11 passes on x86_64 JIT. */ > @@ -5290,6 +5336,23 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { > .expected_errcode = -ENOTSUPP, > }, > { > + "BPF_MAXINSNS: jump over MSH", > + { }, > + CLASSIC | FLAG_EXPECTED_FAIL, > + { 0xfa, 0xfb, 0xfc, 0xfd, }, > + { { 4, 0xabababab } }, > + .fill_helper = bpf_fill_maxinsns12, > + .expected_errcode = -EINVAL, > + }, > + { > + "BPF_MAXINSNS: exec all MSH", > + { }, > + CLASSIC, > + { 0xfa, 0xfb, 0xfc, 0xfd, }, > + { { 4, 0xababab83 } }, > + .fill_helper = bpf_fill_maxinsns13, > + }, > + { > "BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+get_processor_id", > { }, > CLASSIC, > -- > 2.9.5 >