From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52BBAC41513 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2023 16:18:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233446AbjHOQRt (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2023 12:17:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46268 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238510AbjHOQRd (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2023 12:17:33 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EF5510FF; Tue, 15 Aug 2023 09:17:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A02F763623; Tue, 15 Aug 2023 16:17:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B567C433CA; Tue, 15 Aug 2023 16:17:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1692116250; bh=GJXhOxTLVC2pcbScX6mfprqGw84nW3G86vknwi41jo8=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=Cpw+gwOYLNsi4QpcFnwyqjCH26xhX0Hl5k1pGttX61FCOXGrEdLCL5csJknp/14v3 wYf3LJtzf4anRPzstWm1pZthixbfTQE0SO8Zoi1qqfajf7QGtU8oV4Bnb7VsXWBlSo u+3llvCOWahvSldt6IKTAnmQ6dQLsTm9xLISY4XbC8zGw53nsWFaJSs9Mfu6/P4Ah3 KLlOmoHaAQ/OuWWIXzcg/7NxofXLKpVcIOmIEKRsGXvIwQFnk3osjhj8rF+bZHWevI NjDHDoep9GrzLAdVmbq4RefkWXxJM+6BKKOCu9XoDy+XwghYHyO+EqA0DOR3JXtD25 fNnnmZr+pYvoA== Received: by mail-lf1-f47.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-4fe0eb0ca75so8351986e87.2; Tue, 15 Aug 2023 09:17:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwnYMQqN01WEocBWu+pt/2ilq5wourFscUgStHriOt5RNy/f45f MMVaX6H63KYCYE8bFMY0Vt8z/4SLLzmstIfQeXY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFAN8fCvLU1je2c5LvUa+6QYsdOh2vE0bLXOUw+dBC6cLXKkFvXkfB+PTTDOAcfCKPec1981ivpXkrq1b4r5uM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:692:b0:4f8:5cde:a44f with SMTP id t18-20020a056512069200b004f85cdea44fmr11778345lfe.10.1692116248032; Tue, 15 Aug 2023 09:17:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230815091931.4dd2b277@canb.auug.org.au> <8c946512-0cc4-fbc5-ca36-0e2c6d636eb2@huaweicloud.com> <48f834c2-b283-4b02-9407-4a0842d4ed72@kernel.dk> In-Reply-To: <48f834c2-b283-4b02-9407-4a0842d4ed72@kernel.dk> From: Song Liu Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 00:17:14 +0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree To: Jens Axboe Cc: Yu Kuai , Stephen Rothwell , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List , "yukuai (C)" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 12:07=E2=80=AFAM Jens Axboe wrote= : > > On 8/15/23 9:58 AM, Song Liu wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:08?PM Jens Axboe wrote: > >> > >> On 8/14/23 9:21 PM, Yu Kuai wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> ? 2023/08/15 7:19, Stephen Rothwell ??: > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> In commit > >>>> > >>>> 71070e7bd25d ("md/raid10: fix a 'conf->barrier' leakage in raid10= _takeover()") > >>>> > >>>> Fixes tag > >>>> > >>>> Fixes: 4d27e927344a ("md: don't quiesce in mddev_suspend()") > >>>> > >>>> has these problem(s): > >>>> > >>>> - Target SHA1 does not exist > >>> > >>> Sorry about this, the commit was picked from previous md-next branch, > >>> and I didn't know that it will change... > >> > >> It's most likely not your fault, I'm guessing Song rebased that branch > >> and this is why the sha changed. Song? > > > > Yeah, it is my fault. I am really sorry for this issue. > > > >> > >>> Is there any way that I can fix this ? > >> > >> Only way to fix this is if I rewind my branch and Song updates his > >> branch to not have this issue, and then sends a new pull request. > > > > Yes please. Let's fix this. > > Please send a new one, I've dropped the old one. Is this the for-6.6/block branch? I haven't seen the change yet. The top commit on the branch (as I see) is 306d74055754 ("ublk: Switch to memdup_user_nul() helper") Thanks, Song