All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@gmail.com>
To: Brian Vazquez <brianvv@google.com>
Cc: Brian Vazquez <brianvv.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
	Petar Penkov <ppenkov@google.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: add test to measure performance of BPF_MAP_DUMP
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:01:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW7248PfqX-PS2ioDx04iKY1g1S9W5amzwBLYNK-u_cLnA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190724165803.87470-7-brianvv@google.com>

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:10 AM Brian Vazquez <brianvv@google.com> wrote:
>
> This tests compares the amount of time that takes to read an entire
> table of 100K elements on a bpf hashmap using both BPF_MAP_DUMP and
> BPF_MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY + BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_ELEM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Vazquez <brianvv@google.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
> index f7ab401399d40..c4593a8904ca6 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>  #include <sys/socket.h>
>  #include <netinet/in.h>
>  #include <linux/bpf.h>
> +#include <linux/time64.h>
>
>  #include <bpf/bpf.h>
>  #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
> @@ -389,6 +390,69 @@ static void test_hashmap_dump(void)
>         close(fd);
>  }
>
> +static void test_hashmap_dump_perf(void)
> +{
> +       int fd, i, max_entries = 100000;
> +       uint64_t key, value, next_key;
> +       bool next_key_valid = true;
> +       void *buf;
> +       u32 buf_len, entries;
> +       int j = 0;
> +       int clk_id = CLOCK_MONOTONIC;
> +       struct timespec begin, end;
> +       long long time_spent, dump_time_spent;
> +       double res;
> +       int tests[] = {1, 2, 230, 5000, 73000, 100000, 234567};
> +       int test_len = ARRAY_SIZE(tests);
> +       const int elem_size = sizeof(key) + sizeof(value);
> +
> +       fd = helper_fill_hashmap(max_entries);
> +       // Alloc memory considering the largest buffer
> +       buf = malloc(elem_size * tests[test_len-1]);
> +       assert(buf != NULL);
> +
> +test:
> +       entries = tests[j];
> +       buf_len = elem_size*tests[j];
> +       j++;
> +       clock_gettime(clk_id, &begin);
> +       errno = 0;
> +       i = 0;
> +       while (errno == 0) {
> +               bpf_map_dump(fd, !i ? NULL : &key,
> +                                 buf, &buf_len);
> +               if (errno)
> +                       break;
> +               if (!i)
> +                       key = *((uint64_t *)(buf + buf_len - elem_size));
> +               i += buf_len / elem_size;
> +       }
> +       clock_gettime(clk_id, &end);
> +       assert(i  == max_entries);
> +       dump_time_spent = NSEC_PER_SEC * (end.tv_sec - begin.tv_sec) +
> +                         end.tv_nsec - begin.tv_nsec;
> +       next_key_valid = true;
> +       clock_gettime(clk_id, &begin);
> +       assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(fd, NULL, &key) == 0);
> +       for (i = 0; next_key_valid; i++) {
> +               next_key_valid = bpf_map_get_next_key(fd, &key, &next_key) == 0;
> +               assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(fd, &key, &value) == 0);
> +               key = next_key;
> +       }
> +       clock_gettime(clk_id, &end);
> +       time_spent = NSEC_PER_SEC * (end.tv_sec - begin.tv_sec) +
> +                    end.tv_nsec - begin.tv_nsec;
> +       res = (1-((double)dump_time_spent/time_spent))*100;
> +       printf("buf_len_%u:\t %llu entry-by-entry: %llu improvement %lf\n",
> +              entries, dump_time_spent, time_spent, res);
> +       assert(i  == max_entries);
              ^ extra space after i.

> +
> +       if (j < test_len)
> +               goto test;
> +       free(buf);
> +       close(fd);
> +}
> +
>  static void test_hashmap_zero_seed(void)
>  {
>         int i, first, second, old_flags;
> @@ -1758,6 +1822,7 @@ static void run_all_tests(void)
>         test_hashmap_walk(0, NULL);
>         test_hashmap_zero_seed();
>         test_hashmap_dump();
> +       test_hashmap_dump_perf();
>
>         test_arraymap(0, NULL);
>         test_arraymap_percpu(0, NULL);
> --
> 2.22.0.657.g960e92d24f-goog
>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-24 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-24 16:57 [PATCH bpf-next 0/6] bpf: add BPF_MAP_DUMP command to dump more than one entry per call Brian Vazquez
2019-07-24 16:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/6] bpf: add bpf_map_value_size and bp_map_copy_value helper functions Brian Vazquez
2019-07-24 20:53   ` Song Liu
2019-07-24 16:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/6] bpf: add BPF_MAP_DUMP command to dump more than one entry per call Brian Vazquez
2019-07-24 19:54   ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-07-24 22:26     ` Brian Vazquez
2019-07-24 22:33       ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-07-24 21:40   ` Song Liu
2019-07-24 22:44     ` Brian Vazquez
2019-07-24 23:04       ` Song Liu
2019-07-25 23:25         ` Brian Vazquez
2019-07-25 23:54           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-07-26  1:02             ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-07-26  1:24             ` Brian Vazquez
2019-07-26  1:47               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-07-26  6:10                 ` Yonghong Song
2019-07-26 23:36                   ` Brian Vazquez
2019-07-27  0:02                     ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-27 17:54                     ` Yonghong Song
2019-07-24 16:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/6] bpf: keep bpf.h in sync with tools/ Brian Vazquez
2019-07-24 21:41   ` Song Liu
2019-07-24 23:10   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-07-25 23:27     ` Brian Vazquez
2019-07-24 16:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/6] libbpf: support BPF_MAP_DUMP command Brian Vazquez
2019-07-24 19:51   ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-07-24 16:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/6] selftests/bpf: test BPF_MAP_DUMP command on a bpf hashmap Brian Vazquez
2019-07-24 21:58   ` Song Liu
2019-07-24 16:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: add test to measure performance of BPF_MAP_DUMP Brian Vazquez
2019-07-24 22:01   ` Song Liu [this message]
2019-07-24 19:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/6] bpf: add BPF_MAP_DUMP command to dump more than one entry per call Song Liu
2019-07-24 22:15   ` Brian Vazquez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPhsuW7248PfqX-PS2ioDx04iKY1g1S9W5amzwBLYNK-u_cLnA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=liu.song.a23@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brianvv.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=brianvv@google.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ppenkov@google.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.