* [PATCH] CodingGuidelines: updating 'rough' rule count
@ 2015-04-12 23:47 Julian Gindi
2015-04-13 0:04 ` Eric Sunshine
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Julian Gindi @ 2015-04-12 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git; +Cc: gitster, johannes.schindelin
Changed inaccurate count of "rough rules" from three to four.
Signed-off-by: Julian Gindi <juliangindi@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/CodingGuidelines | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/CodingGuidelines b/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
index 0f8cccf..c422ecd 100644
--- a/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
+++ b/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Like other projects, we also have some guidelines to keep to the
-code. For Git in general, three rough rules are:
+code. For Git in general, four rough rules are:
- Most importantly, we never say "It's in POSIX; we'll happily
ignore your needs should your system not conform to it."
--
2.3.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] CodingGuidelines: updating 'rough' rule count
2015-04-12 23:47 [PATCH] CodingGuidelines: updating 'rough' rule count Julian Gindi
@ 2015-04-13 0:04 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-04-13 4:26 ` [PATCH v2] " Julian Gindi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sunshine @ 2015-04-13 0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julian Gindi; +Cc: Git List, Junio C Hamano, Johannes Schindelin
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Julian Gindi <juliangindi@gmail.com> wrote:
> Changed inaccurate count of "rough rules" from three to four.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julian Gindi <juliangindi@gmail.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/Documentation/CodingGuidelines b/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
> index 0f8cccf..c422ecd 100644
> --- a/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
> +++ b/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> Like other projects, we also have some guidelines to keep to the
> -code. For Git in general, three rough rules are:
> +code. For Git in general, four rough rules are:
Although this change is technically accurate, this sentence is still a
potential maintenance burden. How about taking a more generic
approach, and saying something like:
For Git, in general, the rough rules are:
?
> - Most importantly, we never say "It's in POSIX; we'll happily
> ignore your needs should your system not conform to it."
> --
> 2.3.5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] CodingGuidelines: updating 'rough' rule count
2015-04-13 0:04 ` Eric Sunshine
@ 2015-04-13 4:26 ` Julian Gindi
2015-04-13 5:00 ` Eric Sunshine
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Julian Gindi @ 2015-04-13 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sunshine; +Cc: git
Changed inaccurate count of "rough rules" from three to the more
generic 'a few'.
---
Documentation/CodingGuidelines | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/CodingGuidelines b/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
index 0f8cccf..2dd35bd 100644
--- a/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
+++ b/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Like other projects, we also have some guidelines to keep to the
-code. For Git in general, three rough rules are:
+code. For Git in general, a few rough rules are:
- Most importantly, we never say "It's in POSIX; we'll happily
ignore your needs should your system not conform to it."
--
2.3.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] CodingGuidelines: updating 'rough' rule count
2015-04-13 4:26 ` [PATCH v2] " Julian Gindi
@ 2015-04-13 5:00 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-04-13 5:04 ` Eric Sunshine
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sunshine @ 2015-04-13 5:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julian Gindi; +Cc: Git List
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Julian Gindi <juliangindi@gmail.com> wrote:
> CodingGuidelines: updating 'rough' rule count
Imperative mood is preferred, so "update" rather than "updating":
CodingGuidelines: update 'rough' rule count
> Changed inaccurate count of "rough rules" from three to the more
> generic 'a few'.
Imperative: s/Changed/Change/
> ---
Missing sign-off.
> diff --git a/Documentation/CodingGuidelines b/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
> index 0f8cccf..2dd35bd 100644
> --- a/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
> +++ b/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> Like other projects, we also have some guidelines to keep to the
> -code. For Git in general, three rough rules are:
> +code. For Git in general, a few rough rules are:
Looks better, thanks.
> - Most importantly, we never say "It's in POSIX; we'll happily
> ignore your needs should your system not conform to it."
> --
> 2.3.5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] CodingGuidelines: updating 'rough' rule count
2015-04-13 5:00 ` Eric Sunshine
@ 2015-04-13 5:04 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-04-13 12:54 ` [PATCH v3] CodingGuidelines: update " Julian Gindi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sunshine @ 2015-04-13 5:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julian Gindi; +Cc: Git List
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Julian Gindi <juliangindi@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Changed inaccurate count of "rough rules" from three to the more
>> generic 'a few'.
>
> Imperative: s/Changed/Change/
I forgot to mention the unusual 2-space indentation of the log
message. It should be left-justified.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] CodingGuidelines: update 'rough' rule count
2015-04-13 5:04 ` Eric Sunshine
@ 2015-04-13 12:54 ` Julian Gindi
2015-04-13 17:30 ` Jonathan Nieder
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Julian Gindi @ 2015-04-13 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sunshine; +Cc: git
Changed inaccurate count of "rough rules" from three to the more
generic 'a few'.
Signed-off-by: Julian Gindi <juliangindi@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/CodingGuidelines | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/CodingGuidelines b/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
index 0f8cccf..2dd35bd 100644
--- a/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
+++ b/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Like other projects, we also have some guidelines to keep to the
-code. For Git in general, three rough rules are:
+code. For Git in general, a few rough rules are:
- Most importantly, we never say "It's in POSIX; we'll happily
ignore your needs should your system not conform to it."
--
2.3.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] CodingGuidelines: update 'rough' rule count
2015-04-13 12:54 ` [PATCH v3] CodingGuidelines: update " Julian Gindi
@ 2015-04-13 17:30 ` Jonathan Nieder
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Nieder @ 2015-04-13 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julian Gindi; +Cc: Eric Sunshine, git
Julian Gindi wrote:
> Changed inaccurate count of "rough rules" from three to the more
> generic 'a few'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julian Gindi <juliangindi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-13 17:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-04-12 23:47 [PATCH] CodingGuidelines: updating 'rough' rule count Julian Gindi
2015-04-13 0:04 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-04-13 4:26 ` [PATCH v2] " Julian Gindi
2015-04-13 5:00 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-04-13 5:04 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-04-13 12:54 ` [PATCH v3] CodingGuidelines: update " Julian Gindi
2015-04-13 17:30 ` Jonathan Nieder
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.