From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDEDDC07E95 for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 07:12:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA5FC6128B for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 07:12:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231164AbhGJHOx (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jul 2021 03:14:53 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-f52.google.com ([209.85.218.52]:33431 "EHLO mail-ej1-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229881AbhGJHOw (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jul 2021 03:14:52 -0400 Received: by mail-ej1-f52.google.com with SMTP id bu12so20837456ejb.0 for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 00:12:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KWZu/r09lR7pLvaSsPIdSVmvSG3H/lVjsV/rne+1dIo=; b=JyTEyhkrQIxNhHzDy8DbeKUTUoulmG43i0Xx0+k+v3x0StHjqZT77rAQWGyj3xezYj Bj5JmYAL4g3C9RM+0aE+K0bUsAJRU8DeV2RrM1CQoZUiW6vTPpXCDW/pXFxHtttD069Y ne9d1nntl5qb/Uzroi3FeKuWWm4TOgTxc7T0frFPEJuhG1DJpbDL0W9iDpwKgXBm9vcu eEkfx9OzJl73+ydVRDVQ0CjmxvDDVoiWBOyYdAnOo/X75wWpj310SSYEXV6jV4C0lDyK kLY13lHhzR1nMTZbZ8Eu/T+GHiWUorXGDK+6lFbg0/XfPslv/QfQMlWChlAeaSRJ8D00 UFhQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533sRoMD8OFO3g8FfQ/pyFSKyerG5r6XYroFwk902tdwabi2Wy+n 735l773dB0uxx8Bj1qf5KNk/5zz6cMcf4WNmJW0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJznFdah1LvTgaZPRXr2bQiYORev1OcxUFyqf3yXUd2J/ZVGxf/pK2bT4vroae7LIKN4j1fHgeHQpS8DQDYeKHs= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4a0a:: with SMTP id w10mr303377eju.371.1625901125123; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 00:12:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Eric Sunshine Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 03:11:54 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] worktree: teach `add` to accept --reason with --lock To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Stephen Manz via GitGitGadget , Git List , Stephen Manz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 11:23 AM Junio C Hamano wrote: > Eric Sunshine writes: > > "reasons". That possibility suggests that this particular > > reason-giving option of `git worktree add` ought to be named > > `--lock-reason`, but `git worktree add --lock --lock-reason=` > > feels clunky and redundant, which is why I was wondering if `git > > worktree --lock[=]` would be a better (and more convenient) > > UI. > > Sure, but > > $ git worktree add --lock --reason=why-do-i-want-to-lock \ > --frotz --reason=why-do-i-want-to-frotz > > would work just fine, no? Yes, taking the stance that option order is significant would be workable.