Re: [PATCH] t2028: fix minor error and issues in newly-added "worktree move" tests

[Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>]

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Could you please save 'git worktree's output into an intermediate
>> file, and run 'grep' on the file's contents?
>
> Here is what I tentatively came up with, while deciding what should
> be queued based on Eric's patch, as a possible squash/fixup.

Thanks for saving a round-trip. One comment below...

> diff --git a/t/t2028-worktree-move.sh b/t/t2028-worktree-move.sh
> @@ -74,8 +75,10 @@ test_expect_success 'move worktree' '
>         toplevel="$(pwd)" &&
>         git worktree move source destination &&
>         test_path_is_missing source &&
> -       git worktree list --porcelain | grep "^worktree.*/destination" &&
> -       ! git worktree list --porcelain | grep "^worktree.*/source" &&
> +       git worktree list --porcelain >out &&
> +       grep "^worktree.*/destination" out &&
> +       git worktree list --porcelain >out &&
> +       ! grep "^worktree.*/source" out &&

The second "git worktree list --porcelain >out" can be dropped,
leaving the two grep's back-to-back since it they can test the same
'out' file

>         git -C destination log --format=%s >actual2 &&
>         echo init >expected2 &&
>         test_cmp expected2 actual2