Re: [PATCH 3/4] tests: drop here-doc check from internal chain-linter

[Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>]

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 2:07 AM Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:46:37PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> > The attached patch seems to do the job. Apologies for Gmail messing up
> > the whitespace. It's also attached to the email.
>
> Thanks! I was going to say "please don't consider this urgent", but I
> see that my nerd-snipe was successful. ;)

As always. My nerd-snipe armor is in failure mode.

> > This would probably make a good preparatory patch to your [3/4]. As
> > mentioned earlier in the thread, the changes to scan_heredoc_tag ()
> > capture the input-stream position of the here-doc tag itself, which is
> > necessary since it would be too late to do so by the time the error is
> > detected by swallow_heredocs(). I don't now when I'll get time to send
> > this as a proper patch, so feel free to write a commit message and
> > incorporate it into your series if you want to use it. And, of course,
> > you have my sign-off already in the patch. It should be easy to add a
> > test, as well, in t/chainlint, perhaps as
> > unclosed-here-doc.{text,expect}.
>
> Thanks, I can take it from here (and I agree doing it as prep for 3/4 is
> good, as I can then omit a bunch of explanations there). Here are the
> tests I'll squash in (along with your $indent fix):

Thanks for picking this up.

> diff --git a/t/chainlint/unclosed-here-doc-indent.expect b/t/chainlint/unclosed-here-doc-indent.expect
> diff --git a/t/chainlint/unclosed-here-doc-indent.test b/t/chainlint/unclosed-here-doc-indent.test
> diff --git a/t/chainlint/unclosed-here-doc.expect b/t/chainlint/unclosed-here-doc.expect
> diff --git a/t/chainlint/unclosed-here-doc.test b/t/chainlint/unclosed-here-doc.test

The new tests look fine.