All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
To: gitgitgadget@gmail.com
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Add coverage for 'git format-patch --range-diff' single-patch case
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:21:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPig+cT4HeX85SXZgyVQpAZarDFaafeBri7zLpExA=3O403qRw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.37.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 4:26 PM Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
<gitgitgadget@gmail.com> wrote:
> In es/format-patch-rangediff, we added a '--range-diff' option to
> git-format-patch to automatically add a range-diff. We also added an option
> to write the diff as commentary to a single patch submission. However, this
> check was not tested.

It was an intentional (though unjustified) oversight. Thanks for
working on this.

> I discovered this test gap by running 'make coverage-test coverage-report'
> on 'next' and then comparing the uncovered lines with those in the diff
> between 'master' and 'next'. I have a script that automates this process,
> and I'm still working on polishing it.

Interesting. Does your script detect that the --creation-factor option
added by patch 13/14 [1] also lacks a test? (I'm not necessarily
suggesting adding a test at the moment. Even Dscho's git-range-diff
series doesn't have a test for "creation factor", so it wouldn't
necessarily make sense to add a test only for the git-format-patch
case. Instead, we'd want, at some point, to add tests covering both
git-range-diff and git-format-patch.)

[1]: https://public-inbox.org/git/20180722095717.17912-14-sunshine@sunshineco.com/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-11 21:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-11 20:21 [PATCH 0/1] Add coverage for 'git format-patch --range-diff' single-patch case Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2018-09-11 20:21 ` [PATCH 1/1] t3206-range-diff.sh: cover " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2018-09-11 20:58   ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-11 21:11     ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-11 21:09   ` Stefan Beller
2018-09-11 21:34   ` Eric Sunshine
2018-09-12 14:20     ` Derrick Stolee
2018-09-11 20:29 ` [PATCH 0/1] Add coverage for 'git format-patch --range-diff' " Derrick Stolee
2018-09-11 21:21 ` Eric Sunshine [this message]
2018-09-12 14:31 ` [PATCH v2 " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2018-09-12 14:31   ` [PATCH v2 1/1] t3206-range-diff.sh: cover " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPig+cT4HeX85SXZgyVQpAZarDFaafeBri7zLpExA=3O403qRw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.