From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Glass Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:22:51 -0600 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/5] Enhance fs tests In-Reply-To: <20160914133855.GD8156@bill-the-cat> References: <2fe9d0e19575419ca0c7457ac0e50747@rwthex-w2-b.rwth-ad.de> <20160914133855.GD8156@bill-the-cat> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Tom, On 14 September 2016 at 07:38, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 07:32:47AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Stefan, >> >> On 13 September 2016 at 17:01, Stefan Br?ns >> wrote: >> > The first 3 patches do some cleanups for the current test, especially TC11 >> > had some issues (strange match for expected output, use of unitialized >> > variable). >> > >> > The last two patches add test cases for handling ".". Ext4 used to crash, >> > as a match on the first entry of a directory block was not handled >> > correctly. >> >> I think we should move these to pytest before enhancing them. > > For the moment, I disagree. We have fs issues, and we're fixing fs > issues and getting tests while we're doing that is important. It would > be good, and would make my (and everyone else that has one too) setup > easier if these were migrated but I don't want to blocks more tests on > having them be made into different but equivalent tests first. Fair enough, I've seen the issues and these are not large additions. Regards, Simon