From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 17:53:41 -0800
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/10] bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll()
 where the number could be 64-bit
In-Reply-To: <CAPnjgZ3avymJGBrRJCOsr5_SY2VWcP7HQ3Fp_NGeNzeGWeLYWg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPnjgZ3avymJGBrRJCOsr5_SY2VWcP7HQ3Fp_NGeNzeGWeLYWg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210131123606.20702-1-bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
 <20210131123606.20702-11-bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAPnjgZ0LAqzHAfbrFkqtdNQEhrS0P5ikbLxLdsRfd4WEnuA-_w@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 at 05:37, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
>
> There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that
> could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to
> use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
> ---
>
> (no changes since v1)
>
>  arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c | 8 ++++----
>  cmd/bdinfo.c          | 4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Applied to u-boot-dm, thanks!