From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Glass Subject: Re: RFC: New release for DTC? Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:59:08 -0800 Message-ID: References: <201208232015.39613.yann.morin.1998@free.fr> <20120824013625.GA8067@truffula.fritz.box> <201211171250.08597.vapier@gentoo.org> <20121118000013.6964A3E08F7@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Jon Loeliger Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Jon, On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Jon Loeliger wrote: >> >> > >> >> > This has been a bit of a perrenial problem. dtc development has been >> >> > sufficiently gradual that there haven't been many obvious points for >> >> > making new releases. dtc developers (i.e. Jon and my, mostly) don't >> >> > feel much pain from the lack of releases, since the git snapshots >> >> > generally work well (thanks to limited scope and a good testsuite). >> >> > >> >> > I wonder if we should move to a model of just making a release every 3 >> >> > or 6 months from whatever happens to be in the tree at the time >> >> > (barring obvious known breakage, of course). >> >> >> >> yes please. even just a version that uses datestamps would be fine. >> >> -mike >> > >> > Fine by me. >> >> So is this happening? I agree a regular release would be useful, and I >> think it has been about 18 months since the last release. > > I'll apply a couple 3 outstanding patches (from Kim Phillips) > and get around to tagging a new release. If you, or anyone else > have patches or functionality you want in this release, please > post those patches now. OK thanks. I don't have any new patches at present. > > jdl Regards, Simon