From: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] U-Boot version issue
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 14:02:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPnjgZ1VENyQ4Osj81BqTQgWS72MihRgk6hNZMzb_0RGR_m+Rw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9bdc7ea10b3133177ed8106a8df76fc9@rbg.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>
+Marcel who is the maintainer
Hi,
On 8 October 2015 at 14:56, ba_f <ba_f@rbg.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> i have an issue with different U-Boot versions, and i have no clue what's
> the problem.
> Maybe someone's got an idea?
>
> Working on Xilinx' ARM Platform i use U-Boot version
> u-boot-xlnx-xilinx-v14.6.01, and it's all good with that one and even lower
> versions.
> But, using u-boot-xlnx-xilinx-v14.7 or higher results in serious CPU errors:
>
> uboot> fatload mmc 0 0x00ffffc0 bootstrap.uimage
> reading bootstrap.uimage
> 6139968 bytes read in 528 ms (11.1 MiB/s)
> uboot> go 0x01000000
What is that bootstrap program? Maybe you need to turn off the cache
before starting it with the 'dcache off' command?
> ## Starting application at 0x01000000 ...
> undefined instruction
> pc : [<01000004>] lr : [<3ff74bc0>]
> sp : 3fb51e08 ip : 00002802 fp : 00000000
> r10: 3fb572d8 r9 : 00000002 r8 : 3fb51f40
> r7 : 3ffaff50 r6 : 01000000 r5 : 3fb572dc r4 : 00000002
> r3 : 01000000 r2 : 3fb572dc r1 : 3fb572dc r0 : 00000001
> Flags: nZCv IRQs off FIQs off Mode SVC_32
> Resetting CPU ...
>
>
> I checked autoconf.mk of both version, but none uses Thumb mode.
>
> I already posted this in a similar context. In that thread i thought the
> different platform was the reason for failure.
> But now i'm convinced it is the U-Boot version making trouble.
> The platform in the other thread uses a new xilinx U-boot.
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-September/228940.html
>
> Now i use the same platform and the same uimage but another U-Boot.
>
>
> Unfortunately, the DIFF between u-boot-xlnx-xilinx-v14.6 and
> u-boot-xlnx-xilinx-v14.7 is 60'000 lines...
Why is there a special Xilinx U-Boot? Can this not be removed in
favour of upstream?
>
>
>
>
> Thank u & have nice day,
>
> ba_f
>
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Regards,
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-09 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-22 16:22 [U-Boot] ## Application terminated, rc = 0x1 ba_f
2015-09-23 23:23 ` Nable
2015-09-24 5:55 ` Wolfgang Denk
2015-09-29 13:49 ` ba_f
2015-09-29 16:13 ` Wolfgang Denk
2015-09-29 16:15 ` [U-Boot] "go" does not work for uImage - was: " Wolfgang Denk
2015-10-08 13:56 ` [U-Boot] U-Boot version issue ba_f
2015-10-09 13:02 ` Simon Glass [this message]
2015-10-09 13:22 ` Michal Simek
2015-10-12 13:52 ` ba_f
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPnjgZ1VENyQ4Osj81BqTQgWS72MihRgk6hNZMzb_0RGR_m+Rw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.