All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot@lists.denx.de>,
	Ivan Mikhaylov <ivan.mikhaylov@siemens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] mkimage: allow to specify signing algorithm
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 06:40:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPnjgZ1g=sZfWcqi7jbyLHbj3sHaKgpJZ8GHghO9F=Wpgj5fMg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <276812c9-80e6-c430-c1cf-c19566accc02@siemens.com>

Hi Jan,

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 05:38, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote:
>
> On 25.11.21 20:03, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Another step to decouple the FIT image specification from the actual
> > signing: With these changes, the signature nodes can leave out an algo
> > property, mkimage will initialize that as well while signing. This way,
> > in-tree FIT source files can be prepared for gaining signatures without
> > defining the key type or size upfront, forcing users to patch the code
> > to change that.
> >
> > Patch 1 is preparatory for this, patch 2 a drive-by cleanup.
> >
> > A better solution would actually be if the algorithm was derived from
> > the provided key. But the underlying crypto layer seems to be rather
> > unprepared for that.
> >
> > Jan
> >
> > Jan Kiszka (3):
> >    image-fit: Make string of algo parameter constant
> >    mkimage: Drop unused OPT_STRING constant
> >    mkimage: Allow to specify the signature algorithm on the command line
> >
> >   boot/image-fit-sig.c |  2 +-
> >   boot/image-fit.c     |  8 +++----
> >   doc/mkimage.1        |  5 +++++
> >   include/image.h      |  5 +++--
> >   tools/fit_image.c    |  3 ++-
> >   tools/image-host.c   | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> >   tools/imagetool.h    |  1 +
> >   tools/mkimage.c      |  6 ++++--
> >   8 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Ping on this series.
>
> Jan
>
> --
> Siemens AG, Technology
> Competence Center Embedded Linux

Somehow I did not get this. Can you please resend it?  I have lost
some patches to spam filters.

Regards,
Simon

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-13 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-25 19:03 [PATCH 0/3] mkimage: allow to specify signing algorithm Jan Kiszka
2021-11-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] image-fit: Make string of algo parameter constant Jan Kiszka
2021-11-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] mkimage: Drop unused OPT_STRING constant Jan Kiszka
2021-11-25 19:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] mkimage: Allow to specify the signature algorithm on the command line Jan Kiszka
2022-01-13 12:38 ` [PATCH 0/3] mkimage: allow to specify signing algorithm Jan Kiszka
2022-01-13 13:40   ` Simon Glass [this message]
2022-01-13 23:28   ` Dhananjay Phadke
2022-01-14  9:21     ` Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPnjgZ1g=sZfWcqi7jbyLHbj3sHaKgpJZ8GHghO9F=Wpgj5fMg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=sjg@chromium.org \
    --cc=ivan.mikhaylov@siemens.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.