From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 15:16:37 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: at91: gpio: fix
	at91_set_gpio_value() define
In-Reply-To: <CAPnjgZ1au4JzJ=Od84JSfzhENE-h_jgCyd=3_pE=RgG_U5x5wQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20170323045522.13807-1-wenyou.yang@atmel.com>
 <20170323045522.13807-2-wenyou.yang@atmel.com>
 <CAPnjgZ1au4JzJ=Od84JSfzhENE-h_jgCyd=3_pE=RgG_U5x5wQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAPnjgZ1p7E6gsvDn5UKg8WV_r5zvA3XQgjsEDCyX+jMTBN5bHw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 31 March 2017 at 22:21, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote:
> On 22 March 2017 at 22:55, Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@atmel.com> wrote:
>> When the CONFIG_ATMEL_LEGACY is undefined, according to the following
>> defines, at91_set_gpio_value() references to at91_set_pio_value(x, y)
>> with two parameters.
>>  #define at91_set_gpio_value(x, y)      at91_set_pio_value(x, y)
>>  #define at91_get_gpio_value(x)         at91_get_pio_value(x)
>>
>> But there isn't the implementation of at91_set_pio_value(x, y) with
>> two parameters in U-Boot. This is an error.
>>
>> Same as at91_get_gpio_value(x) define.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@atmel.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v3: None
>> Changes in v2:
>>  - Improve the commit log.
>>
>>  arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/gpio.h | 12 +++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Applied to u-boot-dm, thanks!