From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 13:57:01 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] rockchip: use 'arch-rockchip' as header
	file path
In-Reply-To: <CAPnjgZ3FXOM3e64nmJ4HGKu=NH68SfRDiy7z8iJ=FD1=pbLMww@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20190328030124.29826-1-kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
 <20190328030124.29826-3-kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
 <CAPnjgZ3FXOM3e64nmJ4HGKu=NH68SfRDiy7z8iJ=FD1=pbLMww@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAPnjgZ27YhAodTVEYJWh4QtpB6vOsCZwo8mkuTpezaawBsDy3g@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Kever,

On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 at 15:18, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Kever,
>
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 21:01, Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> >
> > Rockchip use 'arch-rockchip' instead of arch-$(SOC) as common
> > header file path, so that we can get the correct path directly.
>
> Can you give a few more details on the reason for this change? I
> cannot see the benefit?

OK I figured it out from the context.

Do you have interest in supporting multiple SoCs with a single build?

Regards,
Simon