All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] ARM CONFIG_OF_CONTROL status
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:48:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPnjgZ2u9Mzt0b9yu8b9Ok71Y6sRZ7WsD3aJRGGoNqjRdfg3vg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1341346946.2746.93.camel@keto>

Hi,

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Stephan Linz <linz@li-pro.net> wrote:

> Am Dienstag, den 03.07.2012, 12:21 -0700 schrieb Simon Glass:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> wrote:
> >
> > > 2012/6/29 Stephan Linz <linz@li-pro.net>:
> > > > Am Freitag, den 29.06.2012, 10:18 +0200 schrieb Michal Simek:
> > > >> On 06/29/2012 04:32 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > >> > Hi,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --snip--
> > > >>
> > > >> I have sent support for Microblaze. Currently without dts because I
> > > want to clear this part a little bit.
> > > >
> > > > Hi Michal,
> > > >
> > > > looks good, I've been waiting a long time on the FDT support in
> U-Boot
> > > > for Microblaze -- great -- PS: see my comment on patch 5 ...
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> Tegra is using ./arch/arm/dts/tegra20.dtsi and
> > > board/nvidia/dts/tegra2-seaboard.dts
> > > >> and they are composed together in dts/Makefile by calling
> preprocessor.
> > > >> Microblaze will be totally different case because every Microblaze
> hw
> > > design is different.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, that's right. We will never be in the position to define a
> skeleton
> > > > or a basic platform configuration.
> > > >
> > > >> We can use two main buses (little and big endian) and cpu is also
> > > configurable.
> > > >> Based on this for Microblaze is the best solution directly to use
> dts.
> > > >> (DTS for Microblaze is also generated directly from design tool).
> > > >
> > > > ... directly in the context of a board, not arch/cpu, right?
> > >
> > > yes.
> > >
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Anyway - here is the bug message I am getting if I use full dts in
> > > board/<name>/dts/microblaze.dts
> > > >> and empty arch/microblaze/dts/microblaze.dtsi
> > > >>
> > > >> <stdin>:34:3: error: invalid preprocessing directive #address
> > > >> <stdin>:35:3: error: invalid preprocessing directive #size
> > > >> <stdin>:52:4: error: invalid preprocessing directive #address
> > > >> <stdin>:53:4: error: invalid preprocessing directive #cpus
> > > >> <stdin>:54:4: error: invalid preprocessing directive #size
> > > >> <stdin>:155:4: error: invalid preprocessing directive #address
> > > >> <stdin>:156:4: error: invalid preprocessing directive #size
> > > >> <stdin>:160:5: error: invalid preprocessing directive #gpio
> > > >> <stdin>:192:5: error: invalid preprocessing directive #gpio
> > > >> <stdin>:209:5: error: invalid preprocessing directive #gpio
> > > >> <stdin>:241:5: error: invalid preprocessing directive #gpio
> > > >> <stdin>:267:5: error: invalid preprocessing directive #address
> > > >> <stdin>:268:5: error: invalid preprocessing directive #size
> > > >> <stdin>:394:5: error: invalid preprocessing directive #interrupt
> > > >>
> > > >> This is error for opposite case - empty microblaze.dts and full
> > > microblaze.dtsi.
> > > >
> > > > That are CPP errors, because the auto generated xilinx.dts is full of
> > > > CPP pragma like syntax (#something) that are wrong (invalid).
> > >
> > > I know what it is.
> > >
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> make[1]: Entering directory `/mnt/projects/u-boot/dts'
> > > >> rc=$( cat /mnt/projects/u-boot/board/petalogix/dts/microblaze.dts |
> > > microblaze-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -E
> > > >> -P
> > >
> -DARCH_CPU_DTS=\"/mnt/projects/u-boot/arch/microblaze/dts/microblaze.dtsi\"
> > > - | { { dtc -R 4 -p 0x1000
> > > >> -O dtb -o dt.dtb - 2>&1 ; echo $? >&3 ; } | grep -v '^DTC: dts->dtb
>  on
> > > file' ; } 3>&1 ) ; \
> > > >>       exit $rc
> > > >> /bin/sh: line 1: exit: too many arguments
> > > >> make[1]: *** [dt.dtb] Error 1
> > > >> make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/projects/u-boot/dts'
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> I have just tried to fix it by introducing new CONFIG option for
> > > skipping that preprocessor
> > > >> part.
> > > >
> > > > Instead of disable / skipp the CPP step you can hide the auto
> generated
> > > > xilinx.dts with a second include stage, for example:
> > > >
> > > > board/microblaze/dts/microblaze.dts looks like:
> > > >
> > > > /include/ ARCH_CPU_DTS
> > > > /include/ BOARD_DTS
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Right, only two lines.   The arch/microblaze/dts/microblaze.dtsi
> remains
> > > > empty as you have said above. Just new is BOARD_DTS -- with the
> attached
> > > > patch for dts/Makefile you can copy the auto generated xilinx.dts
> into
> > > > the specific board directory and the CPP step substitute the right
> place
> > > > to board/microblaze/microblaze-generic/dts/microblaze.dts
> > > >
> > > > I think there are no side effects with other ports like the tegra2.
> > > >
> > > > If you want you can omit the ARCH_CPU_DTS inclusion. The
> architectural
> > > > microblaze.dtsi file is empty and (!!) have to be empty, because the
> DTC
> > > > will break with an error on multiple "/dts-v1/;" lines!
> > > >
> > > > Here is the patch:
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/dts/Makefile b/dts/Makefile
> > > > index 914e479..b1f47a1 100644
> > > > --- a/dts/Makefile
> > > > +++ b/dts/Makefile
> > > > @@ -36,7 +36,8 @@ $(error Your architecture does not have device tree
> > > > support enabled. \
> > > > Please define CONFIG_ARCH_DEVICE_TREE))
> > > >
> > > > # We preprocess the device tree file provide a useful define
> > > > -DTS_CPPFLAGS := -DARCH_CPU_DTS=
> > > > \"$(SRCTREE)/arch/$(ARCH)/dts/$(CONFIG_ARCH_DEVICE_TREE).dtsi\"
> > > > +DTS_CPPFLAGS := -DARCH_CPU_DTS=
> > > > \"$(SRCTREE)/arch/$(ARCH)/dts/$(CONFIG_ARCH_DEVICE_TREE).dtsi\" \
> > > > +               -DBOARD_DTS=
> > > > \"$(SRCTREE)/board/$(VENDOR)/$(BOARD)/dts/$(DEVICE_TREE).dts\"
> > > >
> > > > all:   $(obj).depend $(LIB)
> > >
> > > Not sure if using another dts file will be the best approach.
> > > From my point of view will be the best to support only one dts file
> > > (without dtsi)
> > > because it is much cleaner then using 3 dts files.
> > >
> >
> > Well there is no inherent problem with having multiple include files,
> > except that it is hard to support with the old dtc when there are in
> > different subdirs.
> >
> > As a workaround, how about putting the include files in the
> > board/vendor/dts subdir as well for now?
>
> Hi,
>
> good idea -- but they cannot be used directly. The substitution variable
> ARCH_CPU_DTS is already reserved for dtsi in arch/cpu. The Microblaze
> architecture needs a board specific dts onyl. That's why I think the new
> substitution variable BOARD_DTS can be a option to solve the CPP problem
> today and handle the dtc -i in the future.
>
> BOARD_DTS can point to anything below board/vendor and perhaps with a
> new configuration option similar to CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE the
> substitution could be affected with freely selectable file name instead
> of DEVICE_TREE only.
>

Just in case there is any confusion here...

The device tree file is not necessarily intended to be built with/by the
U-Boot Makefile. Yes it is convenient to do that, but where you have
multiple board variants it is actually best to have the Makefile build
U-Boot without a device tree, i.e. no need to select the particular board
variant.

Then, in a separate step:

for board in ${list_of_available_boards}; do
   dtc ... ${board}.dts
   cat u-boot.bin ${board}.dtb >u-boot-${board}.bin
done

I mention this because if we make U-Boot build the particular board
variant, then have we actually achieved the goal of a single U-Boot image
that supports multiple boards?

So IMO the infrastructure to support the post-processing of U-Boot binaries
and device trees may not in fact belong in the U-Boot Makefile. It is
convenient to be able to specify a device tree for U-Boot to pick up and
build, but I don't think it should come from the boards.cfg file - after
all the whole point is that we support a number of build variants. The
board name in boards.cfg will be something generic, like microblaze-dt, or
similar.

I hope that makes sense.

Regards,
Simon


>
>
> br,
> Stephan
>
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Simon
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Michal
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > U-Boot mailing list
> > U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>
>
>
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-04  1:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-27  9:29 [U-Boot] ARM CONFIG_OF_CONTROL status Michal Simek
2012-06-27 13:58 ` Simon Glass
2012-06-27 14:35   ` Michal Simek
2012-06-28  1:10     ` Simon Glass
2012-06-28  5:50       ` Michal Simek
2012-06-28  5:57         ` Simon Glass
2012-06-28  6:49           ` Michal Simek
2012-06-29  2:32             ` Simon Glass
2012-06-29  8:18               ` Michal Simek
2012-06-29 20:22                 ` Stephan Linz
2012-07-02  5:43                   ` Michal Simek
2012-07-03 19:21                     ` Simon Glass
2012-07-03 20:22                       ` Stephan Linz
2012-07-04  1:48                         ` Simon Glass [this message]
2012-07-04  6:13                           ` Michal Simek
2012-07-04  6:24                         ` Michal Simek
2012-07-04 20:27                           ` Stephan Linz
2012-07-09  7:58                             ` Michal Simek
2012-07-03 19:38                     ` Stephan Linz
2012-07-03 19:05                   ` Simon Glass
2012-07-04  6:02                     ` Michal Simek
2012-07-05 15:34                       ` Stephen Warren
2012-07-09  7:59                         ` Michal Simek
2012-07-03  9:21               ` Michal Simek
2012-07-03 19:07                 ` Simon Glass
2012-07-04  5:46                   ` Michal Simek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPnjgZ2u9Mzt0b9yu8b9Ok71Y6sRZ7WsD3aJRGGoNqjRdfg3vg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sjg@chromium.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.