From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:17:15 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] cmd/tpm_test: Fix misleading code indentation
In-Reply-To: <d2475f43c83d4c5c851a06bf6916f72f@rwthex-w2-b.rwth-ad.de>
References: <d2475f43c83d4c5c851a06bf6916f72f@rwthex-w2-b.rwth-ad.de>
Message-ID: <CAPnjgZ33kwseZy75yr=b=N0dDL0PsHczH-0_UmbrVn0q_QddWw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 16 October 2016 at 09:13, Stefan Br?ns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
> GCC 6.2 reasonably complains about the current code:
>
> ../cmd/tpm_test.c: In function ?do_tpmtest?:
> ../cmd/tpm_test.c:540:3: warning: this ?for? clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
>    for (i = 0; i < argc; i++)
>    ^~~
> ../cmd/tpm_test.c:542:4: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it is guarded by the ?for?
>     printf("\n------\n");
>     ^~~~~~
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Br?ns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
> ---
>  cmd/tpm_test.c | 11 +++++------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>