From: Alex Dubov <alex.dubov@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alex Dubov <oakad@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: introduce sendfd() syscall
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 13:11:28 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPs88r_5GYAmWhW9rwj8c6oAjy8RZYih2mBubgvqRXfcgiUzYw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417538574.5303.69.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:42 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 03:23 +1100, Alex Dubov wrote:
>
> Tell me how a 128 threads program can use this new mechanism in a
> scalable way.
>
> One signal per thread ?
What for?
Kernel will deliver the signal only to the thread/threads which has
the relevant signal unblocked (they are blocked by default).
>
> I guess we'll keep AF_UNIX then, thank you.
Kindly enlighten me, how are you going to use any file descriptor in a
128 threads program in a scalable way (socket and all)? How this
approach will be different when using signalfd()?
And no, I'm not proposing to take your favorite toys away.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-03 2:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-02 4:35 Minimal effort/low overhead file descriptor duplication over Posix.1b s Alex Dubov
2014-12-02 4:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] fs: introduce sendfd() syscall Alex Dubov
2014-12-02 12:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-12-02 14:47 ` Alex Dubov
2014-12-02 15:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-12-02 16:23 ` Alex Dubov
2014-12-02 16:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-12-03 2:11 ` Alex Dubov [this message]
2014-12-03 6:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-12-02 17:00 ` Al Viro
2014-12-03 2:22 ` Alex Dubov
2014-12-03 3:40 ` Al Viro
2014-12-03 4:14 ` Alex Dubov
2014-12-03 6:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-12-03 8:08 ` Richard Cochran
2014-12-03 8:17 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-12-03 10:41 ` Richard Cochran
2014-12-03 14:08 ` Alex Dubov
2014-12-05 13:37 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-12-02 4:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] fs: Wire up sendfd() syscall (all architectures) Alex Dubov
2014-12-02 8:01 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-12-02 8:31 ` Alex Dubov
2014-12-02 11:42 ` Michal Simek
2014-12-02 14:31 ` Alex Dubov
2014-12-02 14:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-12-02 15:26 ` Minimal effort/low overhead file descriptor duplication over Posix.1b s Jonathan Corbet
2014-12-02 16:15 ` Alex Dubov
2014-12-17 13:11 ` Kevin Easton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPs88r_5GYAmWhW9rwj8c6oAjy8RZYih2mBubgvqRXfcgiUzYw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=alex.dubov@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oakad@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.