From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] KEXEC: Add new hypercall to fix
 64/32bit truncation errors. v2
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 12:56:46 +0000
Message-ID: <CB1A2B0E.27C27%keir.xen@gmail.com>
References: <4EF46351.8080301@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EF46351.8080301@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 23/12/2011 11:17, "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:

>> Just for the record - I continue to be opposed to doing this for the
>> 32-bit hypervisor. All relevant allocations are below 4G there, so
>> there's simply no need to decrease code readability for no benefit.
>> 
>> Jan
> 
> I don't mind reducing the scope to ignore the 32bit Xen case.  Any
> object Keir?

Fine by me.