From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: removal of ia64 port
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:33:34 +0100
Message-ID: <CB9F855E.2FDCE%keir.xen@gmail.com>
References: <4F79DEEB020000780007C0F3@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F79DEEB020000780007C0F3@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: KUWAMURA Shin'ya <kuwa@jp.fujitsu.com>, xen-ia64-devel@lists.xen.org, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 02/04/2012 16:16, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:

>>>> On 30.03.12 at 10:54, "KUWAMURA Shin'ya" <kuwa@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:13:04 +0100
>>>>>>> Ian.Campbell@citrix.com(Ian Campbell)  said:
>>> 
>>> Kuwamura, what is your motivation for wanting to keeping the ia64 port
>>> in 4.2 and beyond?
>> 
>> As the result of my consideration,
>> I agree that ia64 port will be dropped on xen-unstable, since it seems
>> to be hardly needed:
>> - There was little discussion on xen-ia64-devel ML recently.
>> - There are few Xen ia64 developers.
>> - No new feature will be added.
> 
> Keir,
> 
> now that we apparently having reached consensus here, are you
> going to purge the ia64 bits from the tree, or do you want me to?

Please go ahead.

 -- Keir

> Jan
>