From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kumar Gala Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:10:48 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? In-Reply-To: <20090706105526.AAC0F832E416@gemini.denx.de> References: , <20090618145128.69F27832E416@gemini.denx.de> <20090706105526.AAC0F832E416@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Jul 6, 2009, at 5:55 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Medium term goal: > > Analyze which parts of U-Boot are implemented by GPLv2-only > code, and evaluate options to convert these into GPLv2+later. > > Long term goal: > > Move U-Boot to GPLv3. Its not clear if you've decided that u-boot will move to GPLv3 or not. If you haven't how will that decision be made? Will we vote as a community with some bias given to how much one has contributed? Will you just decide? I ask because its my understanding from internal Freescale discussions (from the PPC group) that its Freescale's preference to stick with GPLv2. What Freescale will decide to do if the decision is to move to GPLv3 is not clear at this point. - k