RE: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] rcu: Do RCU GP kthread self-wakeup from softirq and interrupt" failed to apply to 5.0-stable tree

["He, Bo" <bo.he@intel.com>]

sure, we have backported the patch to lts4.19 in intel local branch, and will also send out the backport patches for other LTS.

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> 
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 2:34 AM
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Zhang, Jun <jun.zhang@intel.com>; He, Bo <bo.he@intel.com>; Bai, Jie A <jie.a.bai@intel.com>; Xiao, Jin <jin.xiao@intel.com>; stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] rcu: Do RCU GP kthread self-wakeup from softirq and interrupt" failed to apply to 5.0-stable tree

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 07:27:47PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:10:41AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 06:43:02PM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> > > 
> > > The patch below does not apply to the 5.0-stable tree.
> > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or 
> > > longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the 
> > > original git commit id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
> > 
> > Hello, Greg,
> > 
> > "This patch does not Cc stable because it does not apply cleanly to 
> > earlier kernel versions."  ;-)
> 
> I know, that's why I sent out these emails to remind people about it 
> :)

Fair enough!  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

> > Bo, Jin, Jie, would any of you be interested in doing the backports?
> > I would of course be happy to review them.
> 
> That would be most wonderful, thanks!
> 
> greg k-h
>