From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752799Ab1GHH2g (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2011 03:28:36 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]:46882 "EHLO mail-yw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751064Ab1GHH2d (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2011 03:28:33 -0400 Reply-To: From: Tommy Lin To: "'Anton Vorontsov'" Cc: "'Tommy Lin'" , "'Wim Van Sebroeck'" , , , "Lin, Mac" References: <1309867548-7842-1-git-send-email-tommy.lin@caviumnetworks.com> <20110705140559.GA15771@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <281B1F8BAB4D4BDABE7568809A0AEC1A@starsemi.com> <20110706111616.GA18967@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20110706112830.GA23184@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20110706114629.GA32659@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <6D7FCE1DF69D524D850E799960F2705811271D@caexch01.caveonetworks.com> <20110706193457.GA20378@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] watchdog: mpcore_wdt Add reload value setting for CNS3xxx hardware Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 15:28:05 +0800 Organization: CHOG Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Acw8E8yB+EXH4h9xRHSmPdEx5P3PDABJGK0Q In-Reply-To: <20110706193457.GA20378@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I submit another patch that can solve the warning. [PATCH 1/2] arch: arm: Correct the dependency of HAVE_ARM_TWD This patch should after above one. Should I submit another patch or just attach it in this thread? Best regards, Tommy Lin -----Original Message----- From: Anton Vorontsov [mailto:cbouatmailru@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 3:35 AM To: Lin, Tommy Cc: Tommy Lin; Wim Van Sebroeck; linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Lin, Mac Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] watchdog: mpcore_wdt Add reload value setting for CNS3xxx hardware On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 07:54:49AM -0700, Lin, Tommy wrote: > I am thinking that mpcore_wdt should work even SMP is not turned on. Did the dependency > is neccesarry between mpcore_wdt and SMP? If CPU1 is turned off the mpcore_wdt worked > well with CPU0 only. No doubt that the watchdog itself works fine. :-) But the point is that the patch yields a warning, so it should be fixed before merging. Thanks, -- Anton Vorontsov Email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com